Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I . Clearly define and differentiate between urban and rural development and restrict <br />2 urban growth outside city boundaries. <br /> <br />3 . Facilitate the annexation of urban land to cities by amending state statutes that regulate . <br />4 annexation to make it easier for cities to annex developed or developing land within <br />5 unincorporated areas. <br /> <br />6 . Oppose legislation that would reinstate the election requirement in contested <br />7 annexations. <br /> <br />8 . Encourage ideas consistent with the long-term goal of allowing urban development only <br />9 in urban areas. Density incentives such as sprawl reduction aid programs are more <br />10 straightforward methods of rewarding and encouraging compact urban development <br />11 than using LGA or HACA for another new purpose. <br />12 <br />13 LE-2. Electric Service Extension (AH) <br />14 <br />15 Issue: Minnesota law currently protects the right of municipally-owned utilities to <br />16 extend electric services to annexed areas. Electric cooperatives have announced their intention to <br />17 seek legislation that would eliminate the right of municipally-owned utilities to extend electric <br />18 services to annexed areas. Eliminating municipal authority to extend services would interfere <br />19 with cities' natural growth and with the ability of municipally-owned utilities to serve the entire <br />20 community. <br />21 <br />22 Response: The League opposes any statutory change that would impede or <br />23 eliminate the ability of municipally-owned utilities to extend electric services to any portion <br />24 of their respective cities, including annexed areas. <br />25 <br /> <br />26 LE-3. Statutory Approval Timelines (RS) <br />27 <br />28 Issue: Since 1995, cities have been required to act on written requests relating <br />29 to zoning, septic systems, the expansion of Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (MUSA) and other <br />30 land-use applications in accordance to a statutory time period generally referred to as the 60-day <br />31 rule. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 15.99, state and local government agencies must approve or deny <br />32 a permit within a statutory time frame, and failure by the agency to issue a specific denial of the <br />33 application with contemporaneous written findings offact shall be deemed an approval. Recent <br />34 court decisions have made it clear the law needs to be clarified, making it more efficienl and to <br />35 assist cities in providing accurate and timely responses to applicants. <br />36 <br />37 Response: The Legislature should repeal or amend Minn. Stat. S 15.99. If repeal is <br />38 unlikely, amendments should: <br />39 <br /> <br />40 . Allow government agencies to provide final written findings of fact at the next official <br />41 meeting of the governing body. <br /> <br />42 . Allow an automatic 60-day extension of the time limit if the agency votes down a <br />43 resolution granting the request, but does not vote on a resolution denying the request. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />