83-047 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAYOR WOODBURN: I guess I do have one. This is just proposed division that you're talking about. MR. DAUBNEY: Yes. , MAYOR WOODBURN: (Ina.udible) puttingiri'a: street right here. I presume, since this has never had a frontage assess- ment for sewer, that you would be willing - with this proposal - to pay a frontage rate on the sewer here. As I said, I believe (inaudible) does not have frontage assess- ments on that end of the property. You're proposing a street to be put in. I presume when the street goes in you would have to pay frontage on that. Is that what you would be willing to do? MR. DAUBNEY: Mr. Mayor, I'm making no presumptions at this time and that issue is not before the Council. If Mr. Reiling is permitted to address the Council, he can tell you his view on that. MAYOR WOODBURN: Is this division in front of the Council? MR. DAUBNEY: We have not filed a preliminary plat as of this date. This is a preliminary sketch, prepared by a registered land surveyor - Milner Carley and Associates on Highway 96 over in the City of Shoreview, if I recall correctly. They are professional planners and he is City Attorney - correction, City Engineer - in the City of Little Canada, and I believe also in New Brighton, if I recall correctly. MAYOR WOODBURN: Any further comments? . MR. GEORGE REILING, 661 Heinel Drive west, Roseville: I would like to answer your question about whether we would accept the assessment on the new line on the new road. I would accept that assessment if International Paper would accept there's. They hooked on the same line. If you look back in your records, you'll see that they didn't - they were assessed originally an area assessment for sewer when it went through many years ago. (Inaudible) I told this Council last spring - when the watermain came through, they assessed us on two sides because they - the engineers - decided that we could have a road where we now decided to have it. We have a double assessment for water in that particular area. Now what you're saying - we shouldn't use that. We are going to use it. We're going to put a road in there and we are going to use the sewer and we are going to use the water because we have a double assessment. It isn't prudent for us to use a sewer on Red Fox Road when we have the one on the new road that comes in. MR. TIM NELSON, 2015 Rice Street, Roseville, Attorney for Mr. Nielsen: Although we had hoped that the portion -5-