Laserfiche WebLink
<br />temporary provisions would have to be made to serve Edgewater <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Estates with sewer, water and road access. <br /> <br />He noted that the <br /> <br />gravel access road to the apartment building would be lost when <br />the sewer/water project goes ahead and that these temporary <br /> <br />measures will add to project costs. <br /> <br />Supervisor Raddatz reported that the lift station would <br /> <br />need repairs soon. He indicated that the station does overflow <br /> <br />at times but would probably run for another year--hopefully <br /> <br />without repair. <br /> <br />He stated that his department had made some <br /> <br />control repairs at the station last year. After discussion, the <br /> <br />Council concurred that the City should not proceed with the <br /> <br />Improvement. <br /> <br />Accordingly, Council member Hicks introduced and <br /> <br />moved the adoption of the following Resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO, 86-41 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION REPEALING AWARD OF BID FOR <br />COMBINED IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS-83-6 AND W-86-2 <br />(NEW BRIGHTON INTERCEPTOR AND TRUHLER WATER) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City has been unable to obtain satisfactory <br /> <br />easements <br /> <br />from Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company, <br /> <br />Inc. <br /> <br />("Naegele") and Arden Tower, a limited partnership, in order to <br /> <br />facilitate construction of Combined Improvement Nos. SS-83-6 and <br /> <br />W-86-2, <br /> <br />New Brighton Interceptor and Truhler Water <br /> <br />(the <br /> <br />"Improvement"), and <br />. WHEREAS, the City's securing such easements was a prime <br />~ condition precedent, set forth in Paragraph I of Amended <br />Resolution No. 86-36, which has not been fulfilled, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by letter dated August 18, 1986, the contractor <br />to whom the City had awarded a contract to perform the Improve- <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />