Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />their facilities in the right-of-way. He added that he did not <br />believe that the City's sewer and water lines in the right-of-way <br />... would be affected by this improvement because they were embedded <br />in good material. <br /> <br />Lastly, Engineer Christoffersen said that it was possible <br /> <br />that the surcharging improvement could be done by the contractor <br /> <br />hired by the State of Minnesota at the time the contractor does <br /> <br />the 694/Hamline improvement the State is contemplating under some <br />type of cooperative agreement but that if the State's contractor <br /> <br />did the job, up front money would be required from the City by <br /> <br />the State. <br /> <br />After some discussion, Councilman Sather introduced and <br /> <br />moved the adoption of the following resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 85-18 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING <br />PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR AND <br />CONSTRUCTION OF HAMLINE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT 85-l, <br />PHASE I (SURCHARGING HAMLINE AVENUE BETWEEN <br />FLORAL DRIVE AND STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 96) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by motion adopted on March 25, 1985, the Council <br />of the City directed the City Engineer to prepare a preliminary <br />report as to the feasibility (the "Feasibility Report") of the <br />City's filling the low areas of Hamline Avenue between State <br />Trunk Highway No. 96 and Floral Drive to prepare that segment for <br />Phase II of the Hamline Avenue Improvement Project, this filling <br />... to be accomplished as part of the City's Hamline Avenue Improve- <br />ment 85-l, Phase I (the "Improvement"), and to include in the <br /> <br />Feasibility Report for the Improvement the estimated cost thereof <br />and an indication as to whether the Improvement should best be <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />