Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />{' <br />I <br /> <br />Hamline Avenue is not anticipated to replace Lexington Avenue as a through route of <br />choice with the addition of signals at Victoria Avenue and Guidant Drive North as <br />Lexington Avenue will be expanded to a four-lane facility with turn lanes thereby <br />improving the overall level of service along Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />12. Noise level monitoring is used both to document existing noise levels and to calibrate the <br />noise models. <br /> <br />The existing noise levels predicted by the traffic noise model closely match the levels <br />monitored on July 9, 2002; this supports the validity of existing noise levels computed for <br />receptors within the AUAR study area. During a monitoring session, traffic volumes are <br />counted while the noise levels are recorded; these counted volumes are checked against <br />typical peak hour traffic volumes. The traffic volumes counted on July 9, 2002 were very <br />similar to typical existing volumes. <br /> <br />EUGENE SCALES <br /> <br />1. As identified in the Draft AUAR, including Figure 4 (the proposed site plan), Ramp #5 is <br />being built to accommodate 900 cars. Figure 5 is an existing land use map prepared by <br />the City of Arden Hills and does not contain information regarding the proposer's <br />development plans. The remainder of the Draft AUAR document also references 900 cars <br />in Ramp #5. <br /> <br />2. A reference has been added to the footnote in Item 6 of the Final AUAR to direct <br />rcviewers to Item 10 - Cover Types for clarification of "cover types." Othcr cover typcs <br />include such things as lawn/landscaping and impervious (building and pavement). <br /> <br />3. Additional information has been added to Table 2 of the Final AUAR (Building and Park <br />Ramp Heights [Existing and Proposed]) to provide not only the hcight of buildings and <br />parking ramps from grade but also the height from sea level and penthouse height <br />information, maximum parking ramp height information and number of levels/stories <br />above and below grade. <br /> <br />Tbe height of the proposed Ramp #1 will be approximately the same height as Building <br />C. Building C is 28 feet above grade or 1,034 feet above grade with thc penthouse <br />(1,020 fcct without the penthouse). The proposed ramp would be 38 feet above grade <br />with the stairwell enclosure. There is no penthouse on this ramp or any of the others <br />proposed. Without the stairwell enclosure, the ramp is approximately 28 to 30 feet above <br />grade to the uppennost wall of the fourth level parking. Due to the similar height of these <br />structures, furthcr considcration of the ramps orientation and depth will not be <br />considered. Many factors were considered in developing the parking ramp heights above <br />gradc and orientation including the soil conditions of the specific area. <br /> <br />Guidant Campus Master Plan <br />Responses to Comments <br /> <br />- 8 - <br /> <br />] anuary 2003 <br />