CCP 03-31-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. UDdate . The City Planner and City Attorney met with Mr. Trarnm on January 27, 2003 to discuss the platting requirements. Mr. Trarnm stated that he was looking at an alternate method of property division instead of platting the property. Mr. Trarnm's surveyor and attorney have advised him that a new Registered Land Survey would be more appropriate for his building situation than platting. The new Registered Land Survey would reflect the eight new tracts created with Mr. Trarnm's development of the office building on the property. It appears that a Registered Land Survey would need to be signed-offby the City. The property which the building would be built on is currently defined by Registered Land Survey number 496. Since this effectively describes the property it is the City Attorney's recommendation that the platting requirement should be waived. However, the City's Subdivision Ordinance states that the subdivision of property, not platting, would trigger a public use/park dedication fee. The City Attorney informed Mr. Trarnm that his opinion was that the proposed development would be a subdivision of property and that the development would be subject to the public use/park dedication fees. The attached Planned Unit Development Permit calls for final plat approval or waiver of the platting requirement by the City Council. Subsequent to the January 27th meeting, the City Planner and Community Services Director met with Mr. Trarnm on February 4, 2003 to discu$s possible public use dedication fees. Staff has . negotiated a 6.5% public use dedication fee (the maximum public use dedication fee is 10%). Mitigating circumstances include that Mr. Tramm would be providing a trail and sidewalk for the north and west sides of the property respectively, also Mr. Trarnm would be granting the City an easement for the lift station. In addition, given the neighborhood business scale of the development it seems reasonable to have a public use dedication fee which is somewhere between a residential fee and that of a larger commercial development. Staff is comfortable with the 6.5% public use dedication fee given the mitigating circum$tances. Staff Recommendation By motion (in three separate and sequential motions), staff is recommending approval of the following items: I) Waiver of the platting procedure for this property. In its place the applicant shall provide the City with an executed copy of the alternate method of property division (Common Interest Community Certificate or a new Registered Land Survey). Approval of the attached Planned Unit Development Permit subject to the following conditions: a. Execution of the document by the City after all the required information has been provided. b. The lift station easement (see the attached draft easement), as referenced in the Master and Final Planned Unit Development Permit; Paragraph 3.00, number 7, shall be executed as a separate document and shall reflect the legal description as . 2) PC #02-32 - COlmciJ Report 03125103 - Page 2 00