My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-14-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 04-14-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:20 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:35:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, -.:. . ~ J <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />( , <br />1 ) <br /> <br />" <br />, , <br />\ ) <br /> <br />and undevelopable, piece of property 41 % of its property value, when homeowners in the <br />area are typically assessed less than 3% of the value of their properties, produces "unfair <br />and undesirable results." <br /> <br />At the very minimum, the property owned by the Association should be assessed at a <br />ratio which is no more than the assessment to value ratio that exists for the developed <br />homeowner properties within the scope of this project. The City's Assessment Manual <br />states that a criteria of fairness should be applied, We believe that assessing the <br />Association property at. a ratio that is more than 13 times: greater than the ratio at which <br />other properties in the neighborhood are assessed falls short of the City's own standard. <br /> <br />In summary, the Association believes that the proposed assessment against the <br />Association is based upon inaccurate information about the property owned by the <br />Association. We further believe that pursuant to the City's Assessment Policy the <br />Association's property fulfills all ofthe City's criteria for being exempt from the City's <br />Assessment RolL Namely, that it cannot be developed; the improvement provides no <br />special benefit, and that the proposed assessment produces "unfair and undesirable <br />results." We, therefore, object to the City's proposed assessment and request that itbe <br />deleted from the City's Assessment RolL <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.