My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-19-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 05-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />April 10, 2003 <br />P age Three <br /> <br />Audit Adjustments <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards define an audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the combined financial <br />statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. An audit adjustment mayor <br />may not indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the City's financial reporting process (that is, cause future financial <br />statements to be materially misstated). In our jndgment, none of the adjustments we proposed, whether recorded or unrecorded by <br />the City, either individually or in the aggregate, indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the City's fmancial <br />reporting process. We did propose 26 journal entries that are considered year end accounting entries that a City should make in <br />order to have accurate records before an audit begins. We encourage the City to reduce the accounting entries necessary to adjust <br />year end balances. We noted no unconceted misstatements. <br /> <br />Disagreements with Management <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to <br />our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the general purpose <br />financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our <br />audit. <br /> <br />Consultations with Other Independent Accountauts <br /> <br />In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to <br />obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's <br />general purpose [mandaI statements or a detennination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, <br />our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check v:,,rith us to detennine that the consultant has all the relevant <br />facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. <br /> <br />Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Indcpendcnt Auditors <br /> <br />We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with <br />management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our <br />professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. <br /> <br />Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit <br /> <br />We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.