My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-19-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 05-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />April 10, 2003 <br />Page Four <br /> <br />Other Matters <br /> <br />The following are areas that came to our attention during the audit that we feel should be reviewed: <br /> <br />Financial Position and Results of Operations <br /> <br />General Fuud <br /> <br />The general fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government, which are not required legally or <br />by souud priucipal managemenr to be accouuted for in another fund. The general fund fund balance increased $39,468 from <br />2001. The fund balance of $753, 172 is 23 percent of the 2003 budgeted expenditures. We recommend the fund balance be <br />maintained at a level sufficient to fund operations until the major revenue sources are received in June. We feel a reserve of <br />approximately 40 to 50 percent of planned expenditures and transfers out is adequate to meet working capital and small <br />emergency needs. At the current level, the fund balance is below the range of what is geuerally recommended as a minimum, <br />but the City has significant reserve funds in the capital projects fund to provide for working capital. <br /> <br />In a press release on January 31, 2003, the Mimlcsota Office of the State Auditor classified cities' unreserved fund balance <br />levels relative to expenditures as follows: <br /> <br />Extremely low <br />Low <br />Acceptable <br />Moderately high <br />High <br />Very high <br />Extremely high <br /> <br />Under 20% <br />21-34% <br />35 - 50% <br />51- 64% <br />65 - 100% <br />100 - 150% <br />Above 150% <br /> <br />The State Auditor elassified 21.2 percent of all Minnesota cities in the high category in 2001. They did group all general, <br />special revenue and debt service ftmds of the city when making this calculation where our calculation is based only on the <br />general funds. If the general and special revenue funds were grouped together, the unreserved fund balance would total <br />$1,412,566 and this would represent 31 percent of the 2003 budgeted expenditures for the general and special revenue funds. <br />Although there is no legislation regulating fund halance, it is a good policy to designate intended use of fund balance. This <br />helps address citizen concerns as to the use of fund balance and tax levels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.