My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-27-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 05-27-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:26 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:36:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />District to ascertain what needs to occur prior to altering this area. In addition, the City <br />Engineer will need to review stormwater, drainage, and utility plans as part of the PUD <br />review process. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7. Building Elevations: The enclosed building elevations show the exterior of the proposed <br />addition. While the matcrials are not detailed, it appears that the primary materials are <br />similar to those used on other portions of the church. Staff would suggest windows or some <br />other design features to visually break up the northern span of the building. <br /> <br />8. Sign age: This particular property is located in the Sign District 2, or the district for all non- <br />residential uses in any residential, R-I through R-4, zoning district. Based on our signage <br />regulations, properties are allowed 20 square feet for wall signage, and 48 square feet for a <br />freestanding sign. Since this is a PUD, additional signage may be granted. The applicant is <br />requesting the following: <br /> <br />. Two existing directional signs <br />· Two freestanding signs 12' x 10' <br /> <br />Sil!nal!e Tvpe <br />Directional Signs <br />Freestanding Signs <br /> <br />Location <br />Hwy. 10/ Hwy. 96 <br />I at each entry drive <br /> <br />Square Footal!e <br />? <br />240 <br /> <br />Given the size of the operation and since the building has two street fronts, staff would agree <br />that additional building signage is appropriate. However, the signage above does appear to <br />be excessive relative to our signage requirements. Staff would suggest the applicant evaluate <br />areas where signage can be reduced and/or eliminated in conjunction with the PUD <br />submittals. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Provide comments relative to the applicant's Concept Planned Unit Development <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />4A-l <br /> <br />Statement and Plan Set submitted by the applicant <br /> <br />PC #03-10 - PC Report 05/01/2003 - Page 5 of5 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.