My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-29-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 09-29-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2008 2:15:37 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> C) ,r, <br />" { ) <br />. (Square Feet) (%) (Square Feet) (%) (Square Feet) (%) <br /> 1,414,926 35% Min 2,184,701 533% 2,140,701 532% <br /> <br /> <br />4. Phasing - Not contemplated in approved phasing schedule, <br /> <br />The phasing schedule of improvements for the Master Plan does not contemplate any <br />expansion to Building N. The phasing schedule will need to be amended to reflect this <br />change. <br /> <br />5. Parking - Does not meet requirement (Guidant is proposing proof of parking to meet the <br />requirement), <br /> <br />The proposed addition to Building N and the surrounding parking lot would add 40 <br />parking spaces to the campus and the Master Plan PUD, The campus would be left with <br />a net deficit of 302 parking spaces from the parking requirements, Guidant has proposed <br />that that deficit be accommodated by proof of parking, allowing for 806 potential spaces <br />should the need for those spaces become apparent <br /> <br />. 6, Height of Buildings - Does not meet requirement (maintains current height), <br /> <br />Building N is currently 40 feet tall, 5 feet above the maximum height permitted in the 1-1 <br />Zoning District Guidant has proposed continuing the current roofline of the building for <br />the addition, A variance of 5 feet will be required, <br /> <br />Proposed Buildings and Building Additions <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Traffic <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Traffic has remained one of the key issues for the Campus Master Plan, However, the <br />Master Plan (Second) Amendment should not have a significant impact on traffic at the <br />Guidant Campus, Previously, staff received several telephone calls and letters from <br />residents who were concerned about the traffic at the intersection of County Road F and <br />Hamline, The general belief was that the additional traffic at Guidant will only worsen <br />the problem, Staff has only received one letter (attached) from residents about the <br />current application, <br /> <br />PC #03-25 - PC Memo 090303 - Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.