Laserfiche WebLink
<br />n C) <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNIN<h1oMMISSION... OCTOBER J, 2002, - <br /> <br />'.. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />etc, on Guidant Drive Were in plaCe, He indicated Femwood wOuld probably be . <br />reconstructed 'in phases: it would not happen all at once. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ricke 3$ked tfthey would need an updated traffic study at the' end of <br />Phase 2. Mr, Parrish replied they cOuld do a traffic study at the end of each phase if the <br />Cotntnissionwanted, and, tI:Iis could be made as a condition, <br /> <br />ColilItlissilltietRicke liSketlifGilidantcould buHdtraits' on thecampWi, instead' of a <br />mon6fllrypatk dedidltioit;Mr. Reimer replied there were some trails in plaCe now, and <br />they wete Co~g adding additional trails on the campus. He!statedthey were <br />working with staff and the Parks Department on this issue, <br /> <br />Chair Sand inVitedthepubfic to li1likecotnnierit. <br /> <br />ftnlPaUlet,1>285' Wynctest CotMjstated he represented the neighbodlood grotlp'that had <br />worked with GUidant. He stated his comments were essentially the same as he'ttrade at <br />the recent neighb'othood meeting, He stated the neighborhood groUp was made up of <br />teSidlmtsdfthe'W,'yhci'estneiglih'om0e<l. He indicated they had received sOme criticism <br />fur the'rtlak:eUpOftbe.~. birt efforts were made to include people in the ,surrounding <br />l1dighbjj~"He stated they WeI'e.origiroilly concerned about traffic iSsues, hUilding <br />h'eightsj'theiph:tnto'.vacate Fenrwood lilid' the'notification requiretnents;'Flenoted they felt <br />tlieni:li~1iteelings WeteveryprodUdive and they felt there had beensiguificant <br />dO~($'OtIGmdlmt~s:}llirt. He otttlined the major ilccompliShments'theybadmade . <br />.witbi~.'~at'OO'''W$ it thegoaltl)~optl\.e't'IJt}t.uisfuilptan, buf,~erto <br />" llltte;~.~\liith~t intitlfuexpansiolt fIe' stated. the residents ~"atsoveiy <br />~~'ti>~ilg,ptanbewlltChed and folldwedvery closely and that MriOOT, <br />the County, and the City make sure that all of the infrastructures were in place. <br /> <br />PatKfeim, 1m WyftGre$tCoutt, stated they really liked Guidant gening'ritI oCtile 40- <br />fOOt1l)werotttheNestrepl~ty;He stated he hoped this development did'notstlek up <br />abtwethetr~ tOOmDc&gd stated he liked what they did with the parking lOt.lte'sWed <br />he wouldtike'tOsee lIte tim:e 'Changed fureV'ening acceSs to Ferilwood be~!at 5:30 <br />p.m, instead of 6:00 p.m, He stated he liked theeommerit to do a traffic study after each <br />phase. <br /> <br />PiluiStoddatd, 13HKittth'Lake Circle, agreed with the other speakers and'stated <br />GUidanthad bOO'n':1' good neighbor, arid even though he was not anxious to 'See the <br />, devlllopmentttlke pIace,it was litleast being done in a reasonable manner, He asked if <br />tire, ~e study that had been done took into account the two new propOsedenttances <br />along County RO'ad F and asked if they would have some type of traffic control at County <br />Road F and Hantline. Mr, Parrish replied that was an improvement they had been talking <br />about with the County, <br /> <br />ME Reimer-replied the new entrances were included in the traffic study, <br /> <br />, Bill Franke; 1228 WymidgeDrive, stated this was not turning out qUite as he expected, . <br />With respect to ,the Master Nail; he felt very comfortable to where the Master Plan had <br />gone, However, Guidant was asking the City to make decisions about things without a <br />Development Agreement. He asked why that had not been discussed with the <br />Commission. He stated he did not oppose the Master Plan, but he wanted to know that the <br />