My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-27-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 10-27-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:43 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:38:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br />October 20, 2003 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />site. She stated she wanted to actually "see" the product Centex had produced in <br />Minnesota. <br /> <br />Mr. Rehbein said although CRR did not want to duplicate the environmental work <br />the MPCA had already accomplished, but he could bring more details to the <br />Council. <br /> <br />Attorney Filla encouraged the Council to state its specific request for information <br />so the developer could provide it to them in a reasonable time-frame. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he was not interested in pursuing another <br />developer, but at this time, it may be a bit premature to talk about adopting the <br />proposed amendments to the interim agreement. He suggested it may be more <br />appropriate to bring forth the issue in six months. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Grant and Holden echoed Councilmember Larson's comments, <br />based on the fact that they needed more information. <br /> <br />The consensus was that the Council was not rejecting the amendment to the <br />interim agreement at this time. Rather, it needed more time to see the Centex <br />product; budget items; and environmental information. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski complimented Bart Rehbein for his efforts, which resulted in <br />the success ofthe outcome of the Postal Service issue on the TCAAP property. <br /> <br />3. FINANCE: none <br /> <br />4.C Ramsev County Joint Maintenance Facility Aj!reement <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish reviewed the joint agreement for ownership, financing, operations <br />and use of the Ramsey County Public Works/Partners Facility. He said the <br />agreement did not indicate actual ownership of the facility; rather the City had the <br />right to occupy a portion of the facility, in perpetuity. He noted that, after ten <br />years, the City could terminate the agreement, but the County could not initiate <br />termination at any time. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated the agreement had not been approved by Ramsey County at this <br />time. He noted after ten years, options may be limited for the City should Mounds <br />View or the City decide to terminate the agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.