My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-17-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 11-17-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:46 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo <br />City Council <br />Committees & Appointments <br />2 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />2. Cost Savings (direct and indirect) - an in-house engineer would provide cost savings <br />opportunities since his/her time would be less expensive than a contract engineer. Some <br />of the savings would be direct, some would be in direct in the form of cost avoidance (if <br />not for having this position, we would have to contract for the work.) <br />3. Growing need - our need for engineering assistance has been growing and will continue <br />to grow. The city has been undertaking infrastructure improvement projects with the <br />pavement management program, and there have also been many utility-related projects in <br />recent years. The TCAAP redevelopment will greatly impact our needs for engineering <br />assistance. <br /> <br />There are also benefits to continuing to contract engineering services. As outlined in the budget <br />presentation materials, there is a depth and variety of experience available when contracting with <br />a firm. The current engineering firm has a familiarity with the staff and community. However, <br />since the in-house position would not be able to perform all engineering functions, we would still <br />contract for some services and these advantages would still be available to us as needed. <br /> <br />As you review the pros and cons of this proposal, it is important to remember that the benefits of <br />the position can change year-to-year, depending on the priorities we (staff and Council) set for <br />the position and the types of projects that are undertaken. For example, if we take a more <br />customer -service approach, the cost savings will not be as direct. If the goal is to enhance cost <br />savings, then the focus will be on performing tasks that are "billable". Obviously, there will be a . <br />mix of both, but how that balance is achieved can vary depending on priorities and projects. In <br />either case, it is believed that the benefits outweigh the costs and that the addition of a civil <br />engineer position would positive for the City of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Action Requested <br /> <br />At the November 17 City Council work session, the 2004 budget will be reviewed. As part of <br />that discussion, we wanted to provide you with additional information regarding the possible <br />addition of a Civil Engineer position to city staff. Staff would like to receiye additional input <br />regarding this proposal. If Council is comfortable proceeding, the staff can prepare formal action <br />for Council consideration, and begin preparing a recruitment plan. <br /> <br />\',F;arthlAdmjn\City AdministralOr'MemoI2003\J 1-12-03 Memo to Council RE Civil Engineer.doc <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.