Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 10, 2003 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />would also save the City money because right now the pipes were leaking and the <br />City was paying for the leaking water. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded <br />a motion to approve Resolution No. 03-66: Receiving the Feasibility <br />Report and Calling for a Public Hearing for the 2004 Pavement <br />Improvement Project (PMP), Edgewater Neighborhood. The motion <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Resolution No. 03-65: Approvinl!: a Joint Al!:reement for the Financinl!:. <br />Operations. and Use of the Ramsev County Public Works/Partners <br />Facilitv <br /> <br />Mr, Parrish stated the changes to the Joint Agreement for the Ramsey County <br />Public Works Maintenance facility were not substantive and had been reviewed by <br />the City Attorney. He requested Council consider approving this Resolution. <br /> <br />. Bruce Thompson, Assistant Director of Property Management for Ramsey <br />County, stated they had worked hard to come up with an Operating Agreement for <br />all of the partners involved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson expressed concern about paragraph XI. Mr. Thompson <br />stated he did not know if this document would answer every possible scenario, but <br />they were committed to working with the City as partners in this facility. He noted <br />the County would not do anything in detriment to their partners' interest. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted he wanted to see a clause inserted which stated if <br />the County wanted to make any additions which would increase the operating <br />costs for the partners, that the County seek the partners' approval. Mr, Filla <br />stated this was a clause that could be added if requested by Council but he did not <br />know if the County would approve it. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson replied it was his belief the County Board would struggle with <br />this proposal. He stated however that the County was not going to do something <br />to the detriment of their partners. Mr. Filla pointed out that if the County did <br />something that benefited only them and increased some cost, that increased cost <br />would be the County's responsibility. <br />