Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2003 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />B. Development Ae:reement: (Nelson) at County Road D & Cleveland <br />Avenue <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated on December 9, 2002, the Council approved a PUD <br />Amendment in Case 02-20. One of the conditions of approval for planning cases <br />o 1-30 and 02-20 was the execution of a PUD Permit and Development Agreement. <br />He indicated City staff and the City Attorney have worked with Stephen Nelson <br />and developed the Development Agreement, which was consistent with the <br />conditions of approval of the aforementioned cases and which protects the City's <br />interests. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked why this trail was six-foot wide instead of the <br />required eight-foot wide. Mr. Parrish replied he believed there was a right-of-way <br />conflict. <br /> <br />Steven Nelson stated currently there was a six-foot bituminous path in the area <br />and they were going to leave the trail the same size. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he would like to see the development started, but <br />he understood they wanted to make sure they had a tenant. Mr. Nelson replied <br />they had intended on starting this development over the past summer, but he had <br />builder problems and they had to start the process over with a new builder. He <br />stated as soon as the frost was sufficiently out of the ground, they would start <br />construction. He anticipated it would be sometime in February or early March, <br />depending on the weather. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated Council was an in agreement and this was basically a <br />housekeeping item. He noted Section 2i, should read "Arden Hills City Council <br />reviewed.. ." <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve the Development Agreement and authorize the <br />Mayor to execute the Development Agreement (Nelson) at County <br />Road D and Cleveland Avenue. The motion carried unanimously (5- <br />0). <br />