CCP 07-12-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Staff has enclosed scaled copies of Options Band C which show the garage and additions and any the size of any variances that may be necessary. . Surrounding Properties The Planning Commission directed staffto provide additional information about the following properties: 3390 Dunlap Street, 3363 Dunlap Street, and 1322/24 Cannon Avenue. Staff has researched these properties which built beyond their building envelope and found that only 1322/24 Cannon A venue received special action, a Special Use Permit from 1963 (1963-04) The Josephine Hills No.3 Plat indicates a 30-foot building setback line. The plat was recorded in 1956 but it appears that the plat was acted on in December of 1955. In 1956 the Village of Arden Hills adopted the second Zoning Ordinance, (The first "Residential Dwelling" ordinance, from 1953, adopted Ramsey County's building and zoning codes) Ordinance #18, which included setbacks of 40 feet for the front, 30 for the rear, 10 for the side, and 30 for the side aggregate. While this may have caused some confusion as to whether 30 feet or 40 feet was the correct setback, it does not appear that was the case. All ofthe building permits for the properties listed above were built to include 40-foot front setbacks and the majority ofthose that are on a comer had 40-foot street side setbacks as well (1322/24 Cannon does not indicate a street side setback on the Building Permit). . Building Permits for the above mentioned properties are attached for the Planning Commission's review. The permits show that the buildings were constructed between 1959 and 1978 but none ofthe plans indicates that a variance was granted. Deadline for Allencv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 11, 2004. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by July 10, 2004 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. On June 16, 2004 City Staff informed the applicant in writing that an additional 60 day review period would be necessary. Extension ofthe review period to 120 days allows the City until September 8. 2003 to act on this request. This extension establishes the maximum amount of time that the City can take to review the request without requesting an additional extension from the applicant. Options . \\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2Q04\04-12 Arend Variance (PENDING)\07-07-04 PC Report Arend Variance.doc Page 2 of3