My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-23-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 02-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:24 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:33:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Site Plan Review <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing a 90,000 square foot addition to the north side of Building E to be <br />included in the current phase, Phase I (2003-2006), of construction. The addition, referred to as <br />Addition "J" in the Master Plan, was originally contemplated as an 80,000 square foot facility to <br />be built in Phase 2. <br /> <br />The following analysis highlights some of the changes proposed in the current (third) PUD <br />Amendment and Final PUD application for Addition "r'. <br /> <br />1. Aestbetics - Meets Code Requirement <br /> <br />The walkway has been constructed of half a metal culvert with a wallboard on the opposite <br />side. The interior of the walkway will reportedly be finished to look like a standard hallway. <br />A rendering has been provided for your review. <br /> <br />2. Master Plan and Utility Impacts - Temporary walkway not contemplated <br /> <br />The temporary walkway was not contemplated in the Master Plan. However, were the <br />Master Plan to be altered it would only prove to encourage the temporary walkway's <br />survival. In the future a skyway will connect Building K (phase I: 2003-2006) and Addition <br />J (proposed to be moved to Phase I). Upon such time as these two buildings are constructed . <br />and the skyway is built, the temporary walkway will not be necessary and can be removed. <br />A draft Agreement to Terminate Use document has been drafted by the City Attorney to <br />define the temporary nature of the use and explains wbo would be responsible for removing <br />the walkway if access to the water main under the walkway was necessary. The Agreement <br />establishes a maximum time of five (5) years for which the temporary walkway use may <br />continue. Furthermore, the Agreement addresses the issue of access to the City's water main <br />which runs along the west side of Fernwood A venue. If water main required maintenanee, <br />repair, or replacement; the City would notify Guidant to remove that portion of the walkway <br />as necessary to access the water main. The Agreement has been attached for your review. <br /> <br />3. Traffic <br /> <br />The walkway should have little impaet on vehicular traffic within the site except. Following <br />are some suggestions from City Staff to improve safety for both pedestrians and motorists on <br />the site: <br /> <br />· That portion of the street where pedestrians would cross Fernwood Avenue to get from <br />onc side of the walkway to the other should be striped as a crosswalk so that motorists <br />recognize it as such. <br /> <br />\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2004\04-04 Guidant Site Plan Review Temporary Walkway (PENDING)\02-04-04 PC ReporLdoc <br /> <br />Page 3 of5 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.