My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-29-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 03-29-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:28 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:34:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 8, 2004 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />neighborhood meetings and once the rcsults of the neighborhood meeting were determined; this <br />would then bc presented to Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the properties along County Road E were very short and he <br />believed the people along there were going to be very sensitive to an 8-foot sidewalk. He <br />requested they be as creative as they eould to minimize the impact to those residents. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Authorize Specifications for Street Sign Replacement <br /> <br />Mr. Landwer stated the 2004 CIP had included $50,000 for the replacement of every street <br />eomcr sign in the City of Ardcn Hills. He indicated that with input from the Council, staff and <br />the City Engineer, specifications were developed. He noted the total estimated cost for this <br />project was $70,000 which includes design, installation and construction administration costs. <br />The City Engineer requests that the Council approve the specifications for replacement of all City <br />street signs and order advertisement for bids for this project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how the cost of this project increased from $50,000 to $70,000. <br />Mr. Laudwer replied that the $70,000 is the total for construction and administration costs and . <br />includes installation and removal of the existing signs. <br /> <br />Council member Holden asked when the gaugc of the poles got increased. Mr. Landwer noted <br />they based this on 14 gauge poles and he did not know Council had wanted to reduce the gauge, <br />but this was possible with an increase cost of approximately $4-5 per pole. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked if City staff could dismantle the existing signs. Mr. Landwer replied <br />that was a possibility, but they did not want to pull them out too soon and leave streets unmarked. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore noted that if Council wanted this done in-house, everything would have to be <br />stoppcd with no special projects being done, to put all available maintenance staff on the removal <br />of signs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant askcd if the bulk of the cost was for thc installation and removal of the <br />signs and the signs themselves, with thc poles being the least cost. Mr. Landwer replied that was <br />correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he would like to see the City logo on every sign in the City, <br />including County Roads. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she wanted a rcduced gauge on the sign poles. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked Mr. Moore how many sign poles had been replaced in recent years. <br />Mr. Moore replied no poles had been replaced since he has been with the City. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.