My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-20-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 09-20-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:42 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:35:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM: 2D <br /> <br />September 15,2004 <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator rvLM <br /> <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program (CIP) <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />We have had on-going discussions regarding the City of Arden Hills five-year Capital <br />Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP as a whole contains estimated budgets for upcoming <br />capital expenditures on a variety of projects and equipment. Within the CIP are categories such <br />as the Pavement Management Program, Vehicles and Equipment, Technology (computers, etc,), <br />and other Infrastructure and Construction projects. Typically a large focus is put on the <br />upcoming year, in order to ensure that the approved operating budget, tax levy, fee schedule, and <br />revenue estimates include the approved projects for that year, <br /> <br />In that light, we reviewed with you a proposed project list and associated budget figures for <br />2005, After the first budget review, we made some changes to thc 2005 project list to address <br />the discussion and direction provided. For example, we movcd thc SCADA project to a future <br />year. We also moved the painting of the water tower, leaving $30,000 for the testing of the <br />water tower. <br /> <br />As a result of the first budget review, we also proceeded with a utility rate study. In conducting <br />the study, the consultant used the most recent version of the proposed CIP that was available at <br />that time. As mentioned above, some changes have been made since that time. You will be <br />reviewing initial results of that study at the September 20, 2004 work session, The ultimate <br />outcome from that study will have an impact on the planning for the crp and future revisions are <br />likely for years 2006 and beyond, <br /> <br />DISCUSSION POINTS <br /> <br />As we work through the results and implementation ofthe utility rate study, additional work will <br />continue on the CIP. In the meantime, there are a few discussion points that we would like to <br />address at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.