Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />task, but it was anticipated that they might be able to accomplish their task in four to five <br />meetings over the period of the next two months. The outcome of their final meeting would be a <br />recommendation to the Council for their review and consideration. <br /> <br />He stated staff was recommending the Council approve the revised scope of work of the <br />Assessmcnt Task Force. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant mentioned that the City is served by seven refuse haulers. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br />motion to approve the Assessment Policy Task Force's revised work plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated this Task Force has shown that once given specific charges, it had <br />donc a very good job and made this an enjoyable experience. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Authorization of UP to $10,000 for City Hall Roof Testinl! <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated that City Hall continues to experience water intrusion through the building's <br />roofing system. Two areas of the building have experienced leakage since the building was built . <br />almost three years ago. Most recently, the lobby ceiling has leaked four times this year. Once <br />during a prolonged rain fall this spring and last week during a rainfall that was more than two <br />inches. Water during the last rainfall actually leaked in three areas of the ceiling simultaneously. <br />The other two times the ceiling leaked was when staff conducted water tests after the contractor <br />had done some repairs and stated that the ceiling had been fixed. The water tests conducted by <br />staff verified that the roof had still not been repaired. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated the other area that has experienced leaking has been in the Council conference <br />room and hallway ceilings. While that area has not experienced any leakage this year from rain, it <br />had leaked twice this year during a prolonged water test. These water tests were also conducted <br />after the contractor had stated that the necessary repairs had been completed. The area above the <br />Council conference room appeared to leak during extended periods of wind driven rain. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark indicated due to the fact that the two remaining areas of City Hall have been leaking <br />ever since the building was built almost three years ago, and the failure of the contractor to make <br />the correct necessary repairs, staff recommends the City obtain a special testing/inspection <br />company to conduct water leak testing to first substantiate that the areas in question do in fact leak <br />(recommended procedure for arbitration), to do destructive investigation (remove stone and <br />building materials), to detemline the exact cause of the leak, and finally to prepare a report <br />detailing the water testing procedure, findings, and cause of the leaks, and to make <br />recommendations on how best to repair the leaks. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated staff had received two quotes from companies that specialize in the above <br />procedures. Those companies are "Inspec" and "Architectural Testing". Both companies quoted <br />