My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
02-28-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 14, 2005 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he would favor alternative 4 because of the significant cost <br />savings. He stated he was basing this on the assumption that this was approved by MnDOT. He <br />noted they were assessing two businesses a significant amount of money when it did not really <br />benefit from them. He stated he would favor the least costly improvement as long as MnDOT <br />was supportive. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated the disadvantage to going out on Trunk Highway 51 was the <br />weaving. He stated if MnDOT approved the plan and felt there was adequate space, he would be <br />in favor of alternate 4. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she would also be in favor of alternate 4 if there was MnDOT <br />approval. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked what type of responses staff had received. Mr. Brown replied they <br />had not received any negative responses to closing the frontage road, except for the comments <br />made at the public hearing tonight. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she was not uncomfortable making a decision tonight without the <br />MnDOT information. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe asked if it was possible to authorize the specification and plans, withholding the . <br />frontage road and sidewalk decisions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it would be more efficient to say if MnDOT allowed them to <br />move forward on alternate 4 they include this in the motion, rather than having to take this up <br />again at another time. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to approve the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2005 <br />Pavement Management Project as proposed in the Feasibility Study with <br />the understanding that if MnDOT accepts the plans as proposed in <br />alternative 4 that the City Engineer and Staff move forward for <br />incorporation of alternative 4 and the sidewalk project await the return of <br />surveys of businesses in the area. The motion carried 3-1. (Mayor <br />Aplikowski opposed). <br /> <br />7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe - None. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden - None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.