My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-11-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - December 1,2004 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked what the difference was between a therapeutic massage and a <br />chiropractor. Ms. Muska replied she was not qualified to do any diagnosis and would not <br />be involved in skeletal manipulations. Her business would only deal with the tissues. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if she had considered working for a business that was <br />already established in massage. Ms. Muska replied initially she would probably work for <br />a business to get the practice and experience, but she wanted to be around her children, so <br />eventually she wanted to have a small practice out of her home. <br /> <br />C. DISCUSSION ON BALL FIELD SIGNAGE AT MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated staff had received inquiries from Mounds View School District <br />about allowing sponsorship signage around the football and track field. Based on staff's <br />discussion with the MVSD it sounded like the sign age would be banner signs that could <br />be affixed to the fences surrounding the field during the fall football/soccer, and spring <br />track seasons. <br /> <br />He indicated currently the Sign Ordinance regulates all signage in the City and does not <br />provide an exemption for ball field sign age. <br /> <br />He asked should ball field signage be exempted from the Sign Ordinance regulations and <br />should specific criteria for ball field signage be established and added to the Sign <br />Ordinance to handle the size and type of sign age. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated he did not have a problem with this request because it <br />would be internal to the ball field and he believed advertising was a part of the process <br />and there were financial reasons to consider this for the School and since the only people <br />who were going to see the signage were the people attending the event, he did not see this <br />as an issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ricke stated she had no objection to banners being at the ball fields, but <br />should they have some guidelines for it. She also asked if this should be limited to school <br />only. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson stated banners that were only visible inward were a reasonable <br />request considering the funding that was needed to keep the programs going. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated they needed to recognize if there were residential homes in the area and <br />if the banners wcre visible from the homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman suggested all banners be laken down after the particular <br />sporting season is donc. That way, when there were no activities on the field, the signage <br />would not be there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holmcs suggested they mighl want to take the banners down after cvcry <br />game. <br /> <br />Chair Sand noted they could regulate the timing and use of the banners instead of <br />banning them completely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.