My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-18-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2.F. <br /> <br />April 13, 2005 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Tom Moore, Operations and Maintenance Director 6 <br />Schawn Johnson, Assistant to the City Administrator ~ . <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Tree Removal Proposals <br /> <br />Backl!:round <br />In March, City staff advertised a request for proposal (RFP) for the removal of trees and stumps <br />in Arden Hills. City staff mailed out eighteen bid packets to area tree removal contractors. Five <br />of the bid packets were returned to City Hall with no forwarding address. The City also <br />advertised the tree removal RFP on the League of Minnesota Cities website, Shoreview-Arden <br />Hills Bulletin, and on the City's website. The City received four phone inquiries regarding the <br />RFP and the bidding process. On March 31 sl, the completed bid forms were due at City Hall by <br />4:30 PM. The City received two potential bids for the tree removal contract. One of the bids <br />that was submitted was incomplete. The bid did not have the required employee compensation <br />insurance, bond information, or bid signature that was required in the RFP. Also, the bidder was <br />only interested in the stump removal portion of the contract. The City received one bid that met <br />all of the requirements set forth in the RFP. That bid was submitted by S&S Tree Service. For <br />City Council review, staff has attached an Excel spreadsheet with a breakdown of the bid <br />proposals. Also for your review, I have attached a copy of S&S Tree Services 2004 pricing for <br />companson purposes. <br /> <br />City staff was very surprised by the lack of interest in this contract. As a follow-up, I contacted a <br />representative from Rainbow Tree Care. At the beginning of the bidding process, Rainbow Tree <br />Care had expressed some interest in the City's tree removal contract. Rainbow Tree Care <br />mentioned that they were very busy at this time with tree pruning and private tree removals. In <br />the past, Rainbow Tree Care has submitted proposals on government contracts, but they have not <br />had much success. <br /> <br />I also contacted the City of Columbia Heights Forester (Lauren McClanahan) to inquire about <br />how many bids Columbia Heights recently received for their tree removal contract. I was <br />informed that they only received one bid for their tree removal contract this year. Also, the City <br />of St. Paul recently advertised their tree removal contract and only received one interested <br /> <br />IIEarthlAdminlAssistant City AdministratorlMemo's and Letters\20051Tree Removal Bids-April Work Session. DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.