My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-25-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />PC Agenda Item 5.A <br /> <br />April 6, 2005 <br /> <br />TO: Planning Commission <br /> <br />FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PC #05-09, David Radziej and Roger Sabot <br />4365 and 4367 Lexington Avenue <br />Driveway Variances <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />The applicants have requested variances to allow them to maintain the existing shared driveway <br />and add an additional driveway for each of the applicants' properties in Arden Hills, <br /> <br />UPDATE <br /> <br />At their March 2, 2005 meeting the Plarming Commission voted unanimousJy (5-0) to deny the <br />requested vpnances to maintain the existing shared driveway and add one additional driveway <br />for each of the properties. The reasons for deniaJ were as follows: <br /> <br />1. The lack of detail plans and the engineering necessary to show exactly what the dynamics <br />of the access are going to be, The owners have the opportunity to work this out between <br />the City and the County Engineers and come up with a better engineered plan than <br />submitted. <br /> <br />2. The shared access was a condition of approval for the original development of the site and <br />other conditions of approval, which was the turnaround was not met, so therefore, the <br />Commission did not know how the site functions if that condition was in place. <br /> <br />3. Multiple accesses to the property and the proximity to the Victoria and Amble <br />intersection would be more confusing and dangerous to traffic on Lexington Avenue and <br />to the occupants, <br /> <br />The applicants have reviewed the Planning Commission's direction and have attempted to <br />answer some of the Planning Commission's previous questions. Attachments 5A-2 and 5A-3 <br />include additional information that was submitted by the applicants. The information includes <br /> <br />\\Earth\Planning\p1anning Cases\2005\05-09 Radziej and Sabot Driveway Variances (PENDING)\04-06-GS PC Report Rodziej and Sabot <br />Driveway Variances,doc <br /> <br />Page 1 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.