My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-25-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:45 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />additional narrative, pictures and site plans with better definition. In general the information <br />looks at the lack of area for constructing turn-around spaces off of the driveway without . <br />removing or damaging the large trees around the entryway, and small auxiliary signs (to meet <br />code) which would read "enter only" and "exit only" to improve the functionality of the <br />proposed driveways, The applicants are proposing that the existing shared driveway would be <br />the entrance and the two proposed driveways would be the exit drives. <br /> <br />Site Overview <br /> <br />Section 6F3c6 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows single family uses only one (1) access per <br />property. The applicants are requesting a variance to allow the existing shared driveway to <br />remain while installing two additional driveways; one for each property. The new driveways <br />would connect to the existing shared driveway and allow the applicants to more safely access <br />their properties. <br /> <br />The applicants have stated that the property can be very dangerous to access in its current shared <br />drive arrangement since oftentimes a vehicle will be trying to exit at the same time a vehicle is <br />attempting to enter the driveway, In addition to the access issues, the applicants do not have any <br />on street parking due to the location along Lexington A venue, Therefore, any guests that the <br />applicants may have would need to park in the space provided in the driveway, The Zoning <br />Ordinance onJy allows four vehicles to be parked in a driveway at a time, if those spaces are <br />occupied it would be very difficult to access either property. As part ofthe Lexington Avenue <br />reconstruction project a center median will divide the northbound and southbound traffic directly . <br />in front of the access for these two properties. The applicants have been in contact with Ramsey <br />County and the County has agreed to allow the three driveways to Lexington provided that the <br />driveways are at least 60 feet apart. The Ramsey County project engineer stated that it is the <br />County's preference to have vehicles entering Lexington Avenue front first rather than <br />attempting to back out onto the roadway. <br /> <br />Variance Criteria <br /> <br />A. State Requirements <br /> <br />Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue hardship" <br />as: <br /> <br />".. . means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the <br />propcrty not created by the landowner, and thc variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. . ," <br /> <br />\\E<lrlh\Planning\Planning Cases.\2005\05-09 Radziej and Sabot Driveway Variances (PENDlNG)\04-06-05 PC Report Rodziej and Sabot <br />Driveway V3riances.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of7 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.