Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memorandum <br />March 28, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Option D - Reconstruct two Lift Stations in 2005, four stations in 2006 <br />Two station project in 2005 (award existing bid): Total Project Cost $278,000 <br />Four station project in 2006: Contractor Construction Cost ~ $410,000 (estimate) <br />URS Design Fee (4,75) ~$ 19,500 <br />URS Survey Fee =$ 8,000 <br />URS Inspection(IO%) =$ 41,000 <br />URS Expenses =$ 4,000 <br />Total Project Cost =$482,500 => <br />Total cost of two stations constructed in 2005, four in 2006: <br /> <br />$482,500 <br />$760,500 <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer Fund Balance Discussion <br />Based upon our analysis abovc options C and D complete the lift station conversion with the <br />least cost. The City Finance Director has prepared an analysis of the impacts of the options above <br />to the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Fund for Council's review and consideration. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />Upgrading lift stations is the staffs highest priority of capital improvemcnt since the failures at <br />the stations can result in costly repairs and potential damage to residences, Upgraded stations <br />include 5 year warranties on mechanical parts, use less electricity and generate fewer alarms and <br />maintenance requircments which ultimately result in additional savings to the city (estimated <br />$5,000 - $15,000 per year in material, electricity and manpower), For these reasons, staff <br />recommends the stations be completed as soon as feasible, <br /> <br />The bids received in February were reflective of a tight contracting market partially due to the <br />time of year that the project was bid. Considering this, the City Engineer recommends that <br />Council approve Option D which would take advantage of the "winter pricing" for lift stations #4 <br />and #9 and allow staff to prepare plans for the remaining four stations in time to bid during late <br />fall/winter of 2005/2006 hopefully with a competitive field of contractors again, <br />