Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />2006 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br />A. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br /> <br />On April 25, 2005, the Arden Hills City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study <br />for the 2006 Pavement Management Program. The 2006 Pavement Management Program project <br />area is located immediately south of Johanna Boulevard and west of Old Snelling Avenue. The <br />project area is a residential neighborhood near Lake Johanna and will be referred to as <br />Ridgewood Neighborhood in this report. The project area includes Siems Court, Ridgewood <br />Road, Arden Place, Skiles Lane and Ridgewood COlllt. See Exhibit Ai for an overview of the <br />project area. <br /> <br />PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHILOSOPHY <br />The current Pavement Management Program policy was adopted by the Council during the Fall <br />of 2001. The adopted City approach to pavement management is based npon considering <br />neighborhoods as a whole. The City has implemented a pavement management program, which <br />includes field surveying each roadway every three years to monitor its condition, identify trends <br />and extrapolate pavement life expectancies. This survey measures all of the pavement distresses <br />within a road segment and results in a numerical Pavement Condition Index (PCI) unique to each <br />particular road segment. To implement a maintenance program, specific rehabilitation / <br />reconstruction trcatments are recommended based on the PCI values of the street. A specific PCI <br />value is assigned to streets and used to rank all the City Streets in order from highest to lowest <br />PCI (or best to worst). The PCI ranking can then be used to determine which streets and <br />neighborhoods that available funding should bc dirccted to for overlay or reconstruction <br />improvements. The PCI value doesn't determine the rehabilitation or reconstruction cost of a <br />project, but provides a tool to compare relati ve condition of the city streets and allows engineers <br />to forecast the rate of pavcmcnt deterioration and therefore the life expectancies of pavements. <br /> <br />The current policy intent is to accomplish the relatively low cost overlay rehabilitation work on <br />existing streets which otherwise meet City standards prior to those strcets becoming <br />unserviceable and requiring more costly reconstruction Cun'cnt policy intcnt regarding existing <br />streets that do not meet standards for width, curbs and/or drainage etc. is to prioritize them by <br />their relative condition and program reconstruction work as funds permit. Although annual <br />maintenance timc and effort are expended on these streets, the policy does not recommend that <br />overlay work be funded on streets not meeting standards. The following table illustrates the <br />generally recommended pavement treatment for a given PCI. <br /> <br />PCI <br />100-81 <br />80-61 <br />60-0 <br /> <br />TREATMENT <br />Spot Repair, Crack Seal and Seal Coat <br />Mill and Overlay <br />Complete Reconstruct <br /> <br />In addition to surface PCI ratings, issues such as drainage/flooding, water quality improvements, <br />conformance with City design standards and utility condition are considered when developing <br /> <br />URS <br />