My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-08-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:46 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:25:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JULY 18, 2005 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmembel' Larson noted a residential development would still have the minimum distance <br />between the building and lot line of30 feet. <br /> <br />MOTION: Mayor Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded to approve <br />Resolution 05-47, Finding the Negative Declaration for the Preparation for <br />an Environmental Assessment Workshop for the Planned Unit <br />Development, PUD Permit, and Prelimiuary Plat for Royal Oaks Realty. <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated the Council needed to respond to the development as proposed, unless the <br />developer agreed with the revised conditions, otherwise it was the Councilmembers' development <br />and not the developer's development. He noted that making substantial changes, without the <br />developer's approval, would change the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Eibcnstcinel' stated he has decided to go along with a 2 x 2 sign outside the door, but he <br />would like to do some advertising on thc doorway also. MI'. Filla stated all they could do tonight <br />was agree to look at the signage and have it come back to staff for approval. <br /> <br />Councilmembel' Larson stated he would likc to see the 2 x 2 signs outside ofthc doors only. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmcmbcr Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br />motion to amend the amended condition 9 on signage that the signage does <br />not exceed 2 x 2 and this come back to the Council for final approval. The <br />motion carricd lmanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she was not in opposition with a logo on a door, since they had <br />drastically reduced the signage. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Grant stated he was pleased to see the signage was moving more toward an <br />office park setting rather than a strip mall look. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbcr Grant stated believed the Purchase Agreement addressed square footage up to <br />70,000 square feet and he was proposing to havc this development not exceed 70,000 square feet. <br />He indicated a small reduction in square footagc would add to the grecn space. Mr. Filla asked if <br />what he was asking was to add an additional condition that the square footage would not exceed <br />70,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Eibcnsteiner responded thcy were willing to give up unit 20, which consists of 3,260 square <br />feet as well as an equivalent amount of parking. Mayor Aplikowski asked if they could leave thc <br />number of parking spots to match the equivalent amount of the reduction without specifically <br />putting a number on it at this meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla suggested condition number 20 read: That thc project to be scaled back by eliminating <br />unit 20 and the parking space that would be allocated for that square footage. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.