My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-29-05
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-29-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 10:46:46 AM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"Any concerns about not having the choice of haulers at that time, whether residents <br />or businesses, have been mitigated to a good degree by the buyouts since 1996, <br />resulting in few, if any choices available." (14) <br /> <br />In 2002 Ramsey and Washington Counties initiated an extensive study of public <br />collection that included a major effort toward public participation and education. Of the <br />four alternatives considered by the two counties, the fInal report found that implementing <br />public collection was the best solution to meet the goals of the counties. However, <br />because this alternative required major system changes and met with much opposition, <br />implementation was seen to be excessively difficult. The counties ended up pursning a <br />less satisfactory option - "Change Financing and Regulation" - which was seen to be <br />easier to implement. Two changes that carne about under this option were (1) the transfer <br />of the County Environmental Charge from the property tax statement to each trash <br />hauling bill, and (2) long term contracts with haulers to assure delivery of waste to the <br />Resource Recovery Facility. (15) <br /> <br />The final report noted that public opinion is divided on the issue of organized collection: <br />. Those that support public collection do so mainly for one of various reasons: <br />because it would address garbage truck traffic; it would be more efficient; <br />because of experience elsewhere; because it could cost less or because it supports <br />environmental, health and safety goals. <br />. Those that oppose public collection are quite vocal, and do so for several <br />reasons: concern with increasing government involvement; desire to retain choice <br />in selecting a garbage hauler; concern for small businesses; a perception that <br />costs will increase; belief that there is no problem; not agreeing with the <br />environmental goals. (16) <br /> <br />These fIndings describe very well the public response in Falcon Heights. The report also <br />notes: <br /> <br />The waste industry is vigorously opposed to public collection, and is willing <br />,pend significant funds and take strong steps to prevent it. (17) <br /> <br />That has certainly proved to be the case in Falcon Heights. <br /> <br />The RarnseylW ashington report left the door open to implementing public collection at <br />some time in the future if the compromise recommendations do not move the system <br />toward the environmental goals. <br /> <br />Notes <br /> <br />1. "Public Collection Study: Final Report," Ramsey/Washington County Resource <br />Recovery Project, 2002, Appendix 2F. <br /> <br />2. Ibid. <br /> <br />City of Falcon Heights Final Report on Organized Collection <br />October 13, 2004 <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.