Laserfiche WebLink
<br />hauler system provides many benefits, including free recycling services, even at the <br />low base rate, reduced traffic in neighborhoods, less vehicular damage to our streets . <br />and alleys and fewer missed pickups." Kettering, which contracted with Waste <br />Management, has a base rate that includes unlimited trash collection. Cart rental and <br />yard waste collection are extra options. The city also has severallow-volumeflow-fee <br />options, including a pay-as-you-throw system that uses purchased bags. Senior <br />citizens can get a 37.5% discount on the bags. AIl options include free recycling and <br />unlimited bulky item pick-up. (10) <br /> <br />Some cities have chosen to keep an open system, even in cases where their own studies <br />recommended organized collection: <br /> <br />. Among the key recommendations ofRoseville's Residential Solid Waste and <br />Recycling Citizen Advisory Committee Report, May, 2002, was the following: <br />"Meet the City's and State's environmental goals by designing a garbage system that <br />uses environmentally preferred management of waste. Of the methods studied by the <br />Committee, an organized collection system run by a consortium of private haulers <br />appears to give the City the best, and perhaps only, means to meet the City's and <br />State's environmental goals and balance Citizen interests and concerns." Roseville <br />did not proceed to organize collection. The city has 7 haulers and rates comparable to <br />Falcon Heigbts'. (II) <br /> <br />. A 1988 study for the City of Eagan looked at the pros and cons of six different <br />systems, including a "no change" option and developed a comparison chart. The . <br />study concluded, "A version of organized contract collection may lower costs, <br />decrease wear and tear on streets, and facilitate curbside recycling, but also increase <br />administrative costs to the City and possibly impair the business opportunities of <br />some haulers. Each system has distinct advantages and disadvantages." The <br />consultant declined to recommend a specific alternative. Today Eagan has an open <br />system. (12) <br /> <br />. Chanhassen's Organized Collection Study Committee recommended not only <br />proceeding with organized collection but, in the interim, limiting the number refuse <br />hauling licenses to a maximum of six, with no new licensees to be added for attrition. <br />Their survey found that "27% of the respondents were not at all supportive of <br />organized collection, 48% were neutral and 25% were very supportive of organized <br />collection. Chanhassen's findings cited many of the same reasons as other cities' <br />studies - street impact, cost, vehicle emissions and noise - and made a special point <br />that only by organized collection could the City comply with Minnesota law and <br />ensure every household had waste collection service. Chanhassen does not have <br />organized collection in 2004. (13) <br /> <br />. Olmsted County, Minnesota, designed an organized collection system in 1996 but did <br />not implement it. If an RFP had been issued, the County would probably have <br />awarded a contract to one hauler. At the time there were 13 haulers. Now 91 % of the <br />market is controlled by Onyx and Waste Management, with three other companies <br />sharing the remaining portion. According to the Ramsey Washington summary, . <br /> <br />City of Falcon Heights Final Report on Organized Collection <br />October i 3, 2004 <br /> <br />26 <br />