CCP 01-30-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff has reviewed this proposal in accordance with the variance criteria and believes hardship is present. The proposal to reconstruct a home on the property is reasonable due to the lot characteristics and surrounding neighborhood. The situation is unique due to the lot's frontage on three roadways, odd shape, location of the existing home and character of the neighborhood. Staff recommcnds that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance to the City Council subject to the following: L The project must be completed in accordance with thc plans submittcd as part of the Variance application. Any significant changes to these plans, as detem1ined by the City Planner, will require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The variance shall automatically expire and become void one (I) year from and after the date on which the Council granted such approval if work on the project has not bcgun within that time period. OPTIONS 1. Rccommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for deniaL If the City denies the petitioners request, "it must statc in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the rcqucst". 4. Table for additional information. DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION: Febmary 13, 2006 The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 13, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this rcquest by February 13,2006 (60 days), unless the City provides thc petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period, The City may with the petitioner's consent extcnd the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments I) Location Map 2) Statement of request submitted by applicant 3) Submitted plans 4) Request for Comment Attachments: I. Applicant's statement and submitted plans 2. Comments 3