My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-30-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 01-30-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:15 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:41:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EVIDENCE OF HARDSHIP <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The following paragraphs outline why the City should approve the request and how the <br />application meets the hardship criteria as defined by the City. <br /> <br />The circumstances pertaining to this property are indeed very lmique. The irregular <br />shape, size, and positioning of the property are unlike any other. Bordered by public <br />streets on three sides, the buildable area of the property is severely limited and would <br />likely sit vacant should the variance not be granted. <br /> <br />Granting ofthe variance would promote the character of tbe neighborhood and preserve <br />and enhance [he values of the surrounding properties. Granting of the variance would <br />also ensure that the property continued to be used as intended. Thc proposed structure <br />would not cause harm or danger to the land, the environment or surrounding properties <br />and residents, Visibility at intersections of the adjacent streets will not be hampered, <br />providing safe traffic flow as before. <br /> <br />In our opinion, without granting of a variance, the property could not be put to reasonable <br />use as a residential site. Due to the irregular shape ofthe property and the minimum <br />required setbacks as sel by the City code, no reasonably sized structure could be erected <br />within the confines of the setbacks. Therefore, the property, currently zoned as R- I, <br />would likely sit vacant within an otherwise nicely developed neighborhood. <br /> <br />The hardship in question was created by an accidental fire which started outside of the <br />existing structure. The fire department was able to extinguish the fire, but the structure <br />suffered more than 50% damage, and it has been deemed a total loss. At the time of <br />original construction, the structure complied with local codes and ordinances. Since then, <br />City codcs have evolved and required setback distances have increased. Due to the <br />nature of the loss, the pre-existing conditions may not be "grand fathered" into <br />compliance under the current code, and the structure would need to be entirely brought <br />up to current codes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Granting of the variance will allow the property owner to construcl a new home, roughly <br />the same size and shape ofthe existing in the same location as the existing. The <br />architecturally designed home will complement the surrounding structures and enhance <br />the neighborhood. The home will be clearly visible from three sides and care has been <br />taken in Ihe desif,'11 to ensure the proposed home is aesthetically pleasing and not <br />overpowenng m any way. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.