My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-21-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 02-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:18 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 4:42:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />PCI Ratings for City Streets <br />May 12,2005 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />dollars. For example, are we completely opposcd to advancing or financing for pay back? Are <br />we generally opposed but willing to consider under limited circumstances? <br /> <br />Gcneral Fund <br /> <br />For the pa\t several years, the annual operating budget has included $200,000 for various CIP <br />projects. Depending on priorities, fund balance philosophies, and other factors, we could <br />consider varying that amount. For example, wc could increasc that amount (within budget and <br />levy directives from Council) and use it as revenue into the non-assessable strcet fund. We could <br />also finance some park projects (for example, playground replacement) from thc general fund. <br />The amount would be based on an approved CIP plan. <br /> <br />Prioriti,,~ <br /> <br />In general, we need to determine some pnonlles. Some factors that weigh into that <br />detcrmination, in addition to everything outlined above, include: <br /> <br />. Resident input, requests, and complaints <br />. Existing plans and documents (for examplc, the Parks and Trails Master Plan) <br />. Availability of grants or partnerships on projects <br />. Offset to potcntialliability (for example, lift stations) or operating costs <br /> <br />On the spreadsheet you will notice a largc Ilumber of projects at the bottom under a hcading of <br />"Unassigned Projects", This category was called "Floating Projects" in previous renditions of <br />the CIP and included some projects that we were not able to program but wanted to kcep in mind <br />for future considcration (such as West Round Lake Road, Snelling Avenue Regional Trail, and <br />County Road D Trail). As we have been reviewing the CIP recently, I was concerned about the <br />heavy use of MSA funds and the depletion of the some of the funds addressed above. Therefore <br />several projects have been movcd to the "Unassigned" category, including CSAH 96 <br />Landscaping, County Road E Sidcwalk, Old Highway 10 Sidewalk, and SCADA. Some of these <br />we may be able to re-program into the five-year CIP after we have complcted further analysis of <br />funds, developed some working policies, and received the additional information outlined in this <br />report. <br /> <br />CIF Fonl!at <br /> <br />We are in the process of moving to a new format for the CIP. We plan to distribute a samplc <br />copy to you on Monday cvcning. We are still in the process of updating the information in the <br />new format, but we wanted Council to have an opportunity to see what it looks like. In addition, <br />the document coutaius additional infonnation about each project, such as project descriptions, <br />that we think can be a helpful resource. The document is in a database format, which provides a <br />number of ditkrent reports that can be generated from the CIP data. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.