My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-11-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />I. Introduction <br /> <br />On January 26, 2004, the Arden Hills City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility <br />study for the construction of pedestrian improvements along County Road E, The general scope <br />of thc improvements includes widening of the pedestrian walk along the existing County Road E <br />bridge across Tmnk Highway 5 I and constmction of an at-grade sidewalk from the signalized <br />intersection east of the bridge to the interscction of County Road E and Old Highway 10. Exhibit <br />I shows the project location. <br /> <br />The County Road E right of way is owned and managed by Ramsey County Public Works. The <br />bridge over Tmnk Highway 51 is also owned by Ramsey County however, any modifIcations to <br />the bridge require review and approval hum the MnDOT Bridge Engineer. Arden Hills is <br />allowed to construct improvements within the right of way and to the bridge per the approval of <br />Ramsey County Public Works and MnDOT. We have discussed the project in general terms with <br />Ramsey County staff and anticipate that the proposed improvements will mcet their approval. <br /> <br />This report will evaluate the fcasibility of the proposcd improvements and is organized in three <br />general sections focused on the potential improvements, a summary of project costs and funding <br />and concludes with summary and recommended next steps for Council. Thc proposed bridge <br />improvements discussion includes three options for reconfiguring the existing bridge which <br />provide progressivcly greater widths for pedestrian movement. The sidewalk improvements <br />discussion includes options regarding width and matcrials of the sidewalk. The bridge <br />enhancements discussion details and illustrates a numbcr of potential design treatments which <br />could be incorporated into the project. The appendix includes detailed cost estimates for all of <br />the options discussed in the report. <br /> <br />-C~'.~I; <br /> <br /> <br />,,~,'.,., ..;c~~S( <br /> <br />--,;": ,,- <br /> <br />~-_'I,["'!lrtW~."C."- <br /> <br />..,; <br />.. en <br />, :==: <br />< <br /> <br />-:;: <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />\. <br />\ <br />o <br />ry.~ <br /> <br />co. Rn.f: <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />HNI>Y~ <br />.- <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />__ PROPOSED SlOE WALK RECONFlGUII[ <br />ur~IDG[ <br /> <br />u/ <br /> <br />Exhibi[ 1 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />URS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.