CCP 09-11-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -AUGUST 28, 2006 10 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. e. Each individual unit or combined units shall be permitted up to one square foot of signage for address and business name adjacent to the door. The address and business name shall be uniform throughout the development in size, placement, and color. These signs may be illuminated. f. Each sign shall be require a separate permit. g. Off-premise advertising shall not be permitted under any circumstances. Drainage and Utility Easement. The applicant shall provide a 12-foot drainage and utility easement along the exterior lot lines and the right-of-way. Lighting Plan. The applicant shall amend the lighting to be in full compliance with the City's lighting regulations prior to approving the Final Plat. Sidewalks. The applicant shall submit revised site plans that include sidewalk connections to each building, where feasible, within the development and to the City and County trail systems. The plan shall be submitted to the City Planner and City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Trail. The trail along the western edge of the property shall be conveyed to the City in a manner that is acceptable to the City Attorney. Easement Vacation. The twcnty foot wide pedestrian easement near the center of the property shall be vacated prior to filing the Final Plat. Sprinkling. All ofthe units shall be sprinkled for fire suppression. Sand Cushion. One-foot sand cushion shall be added under any sidewalk provided in the development. 31. 32. Councilmember Larson asked if the extra landscaping was part of the Planning Commission conditions. He asked if that should be in the conditions. Ms. Barton responded it was in Condition 9.a. Councilmember Grant inquired about the drainage. Mr. Lehnhoff responded the drainage was currently being reviewed by Rice Creek Watershed District and at this time they did not have final approval by them, but final approval would be necessary before the final plat would be issued. Ms. Giga stated there were two infiltration basins, one on the northwestern portion of the property and one on the eastern portion of the property south of the wetland. The storm runoff from the site would go to one or the other and ultimately end up in the pond. She stated there was some runoff on the south side of the property that would continue to go in that direction, but based on her review of the site, the proposed drainage area were less than the existing drainage areas that were going off to the south side. She stated ultimately the water would discharge into the storm sewer system on Highway 96, which eventually went to Sunfish Lake. Councilmember Grant inquired about the wetland area and asked if that was an infiltration pond and if so, how would the water escape. Ms. Giga responded that wetland would remain and if it would ever overflow they would have a catch basin. Councilmember Grant inquired about the infiltration pond on the northwestern portion of the property. He asked if therc was an ovcrflow for that. Ms. Giga rcsponded there was an overflow for that pond. II .. .