My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-11-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -AUGUST 28, 2006 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked for a further explanation on the lighting plan. Mr, Lehnhoff <br />responded the lighting might need to be moved slightly to the north, or additional covers might <br />need to be added to diffuse the light and bring the plan into compliance with City Code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the original plan had two-story units in it. Mr. Lehnhoff <br />responded he believed there were some two-story units in the original plan. <br /> <br />Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, responded they originally had 30 units with the center units <br />being loft units and the outside units being rambler units. He stated the plans have not changed in <br />terms of square footage except the rambler units are slightly large in square footage because the <br />unit numbers got smaller. He noted they had two walk-out buildings and this was where the two <br />levels came in. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked about the two units occupying the one building. Mr. Black <br />responded they did not have a signed contract with the realty company at this time, but they had a <br />company interested in taking that unit. He stated it was important for this company to have <br />advcrtising on the back of that building facing Highway 96. <br /> <br />Marcel Eibenhsteiner 14 Evergreen Lane, North Oaks, President of Royal Oaks Realty, <br />statcd they had no plans in occupying any units and the reason their name was on the building was <br />for demonstrative purposes only. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated on the lighting plan, whatever they did on the corner needed to be <br />extremely sensitive because that was the closest area to the townbome development. She stated <br />she had reviewed the Planning Commission minutes and they had covered all of the questions she <br />had. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked who owned the access along the daycare center. Ms. Giga <br />responded it was an easement that was granted to the City back in 1988, so it will be maintained <br />as an easement by the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked, given the fact that the Planning Commission had recommended a <br />right-in, right-out only, it appeared to him they should put in a triangular island in that area. He <br />stated he believed it had been determined there was not enough room for this. Ms, Giga <br />responded it would be difficult for emergency personnel to get in this area if a triangular island <br />was put in. <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated there also not sufficient room to allow people in and out comfortably. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked if the daycare had been asked about the right-in, right-out. Mr, <br />Lehnhoff responded he has not heard from them, but they had been given the notice. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated the daycare center should be informed of the possible change to the <br />access. She asked if they could post a sign for "No turns during peak hours" during rush hour. <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated that Ramsey County had offered that as an option. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.