My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-11-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 09-11-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:24 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />· April 13,2006 thc City and URS presented this information to 3511 explaining why a 5 <br />foot shift east was not an option but adjusting the apron grade and rcmoving the 5 foot <br />tangent section are viable options. Two alignment options were presented, the <br />perpcndicular aligrunent and an alignment which had a slight curve to the south. With <br />no 5 foot tangent section and a 7.5% apron, the perpendicular aligrunent has a grade of <br />12.85% but if the apron grade is lowered to 2.0% then the grade is 11.99%. For the <br />southern alignmcnt with no 5 foot tangent scction and a 7.5% apron, the grade is lO.31% <br />but if the apron grade is lowered to 2.0% then the grade is 9.68%. The perpendicular <br />option was still the version that 35l 1 preferred, although, even with the improvements, <br />still increased the driveway grade slightly from 1 1.8% to 1 1 .99%. The resident seemed <br />encouraged with the fact that they would be getting a new driveway surface all the way <br />to their garage apron, their front yard would be expanding because of this alignment, and <br />they would have the perpendicular alignment they prefer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.