My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-10-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 04-10-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:26 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:09:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2006 PMP <br />4/6/2006 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Improvements <br />Roadway <br />Storm Sewer <br /> <br />Feasibility Estimate <br />$ 1, 100,000.00 <br />$ 410,000.00 <br />$ 82,000.00 <br />$ 160,000.00 <br />$ 12,000.00 <br /> <br />Final Plan Estimate <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer <br /> <br />Watermain <br /> <br />Roadway Easement <br />Acquisition Allowance <br /> <br />$ 1,142,739.14 <br />$ 458,524.94 <br />$ 90,948.50 <br />$ 220,055.84 <br />$ 0.00 <br /> <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />$ 1,764,000.00 <br /> <br />$ 1,918,168.42 (plus drainage <br />easements) <br /> <br />There are several factors resulting in an overall increase (approximately 9%) in costs. The <br />feasibility estimate was prepared in August, 2005, and reflects 2005 construction prices. <br />Construction prices have since continued to increase due to higher fuel and energy costs. The <br />complexity of the neighborhood, with the significant variation in grade, has also resulted in <br />increased costs during final design to better match into existing ground slopes and driveways. <br />Some retaining wall costs were included in the feasibility report as optional costs, but were not <br />included in the baseline improvements. During final design it was apparent that even the optional e <br />retaining wall costs listed in the feasibility report were underestimated. The following items were <br />not included in the feasibility report estimates and are also contributing factors to the increase in <br />the estimate: water service improvements from the watemlain to the curb stop; slightly extended <br />limits of the watermain replacement; the proposed ponding area by Lift Station #3. <br /> <br />Easements <br /> <br />Staffis in the process of working with the City Attomey and affected properties to obtain the <br />drainage and utility easements needed for this project. The plans reflect proposed improvements <br />based on the acquisition of the easements. If agreements cannot be reached with affected <br />property owners on the casement acquisition, plans will be modified accordingly to account for a <br />design change. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />In order to capture a market for competitive bid prices and keep the project on a timely schedule, <br />these plans should be advertised in April. Bids would be opened in early May and, if accepted by <br />Council, awarded in late Mayor early June. Construction would then likely begin sometime in <br />June. If a delay would occur in approving plans and authorizing advertisement for bids, this <br />would delay the entire schedule, which could potentially delay the project to the next <br />construction season. <br /> <br />At this time, staff recommends adoption of Resolution 06-29: Approval of the final plans and . <br />specifications ordering advertisement for bids for the 2006 Pavement Management Program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.