Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson also expressed concern about the removal of trees and asked <br />for the Rice Creek Watershed's comments on this also. <br /> <br />Commissioner McClung statcd hc was conccrncd thcy would be sctting a precedent and <br />he would havc difficulty approving this as submitted. <br /> <br />Commissioncr I ~arson moved, seconded by Commissioner McClung to recommcnd <br />dcnial of the subdivision preliminary plat based on thc reasons that this would cstablish a <br />bad prccedent by putting four flag lots on onc drivcway and this could easily support a <br />City strcct and cul-dc-sac, if necessary. The grading plan submitted for Lots 1 and 2 was <br />not sufficient and the retaining wall should be rcplaccd or removcd and a drainage way <br />be added to the north edge of the property. <br /> <br />Vicc Chair Zimmerman stated if this was dcnied it would go to Council and it could he <br />approvcd at that meeting. Mr. Lchnhoff explained if this was denied by the Council the <br />applicant could not apply again for another six months, but if it was tabled this would <br />allow the applicant timc to come back with an entirely new plat. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson stated hc was willing to take the risk with this possibly being <br />approved by the Council, but iftherc was morc support by thc Commissioners for tabling, <br />he recommended voting against his motion. <br /> <br />Cornmissioner Thompson stated she would vote against because shc belicved they should <br />table this. <br /> <br />Commissioner McClung stated he would support the dcnial bccausc hc believed there <br />wcrc too many problems. <br /> <br />The motion to rccommend denial of Valiance and subdivision was approved (3-2-1 <br />Commissioners Zimmerman and Thompson opposed. Commissioncr Modcsette <br />abstained). <br /> <br />oR~t1 <br />