My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-12-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-12-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - May 22, 2006 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />still have lhe option to deny the preliminary plat at a later meeting, A tabled application, whether <br />in full or in part, would be remanded back to the Planning Commission for further review, <br /> <br />If the full application was denied, the findings from the Planning Commission should be citcd as <br />the reason for the denial unless other findings are developed, Once denied, Section 8,EA of the <br />Zoning Ordinance states that an application cannot be resubmilted for the subject properties <br />within six months of the date of denial. It may be possible to grant a waiver to this provision if <br />the City Council so desired, <br /> <br />He noled the City received the completed application for this request on April 10, 2006, <br />Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by June 10, 2006 (within <br />60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with wrilten reasons for an addilional 6-day <br />review period. The City may, with the petitioner's consent, extend the review period beyond the <br />120 days. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated given the recommendation of staff, the Planning Commission, <br />and applicant's request, he believed they should table this, <br /> <br />Tim Horita, property owner of 3685 and 3695 New Brighton Road, requested this be tabled to <br />redesign the proposal. He believed lhey would be able to address all of the concerns of the <br />Planning Commission and hoped to be able to reconfigure this so they would not need to request <br />a variance. He indicated he would be working with the adjacent property owners regarding this, <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to table both the plat and the variance to give the applicant an <br />opportunity to revise the plan and remand this back to the Plamling <br />Commission for review. The motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> <br />D. Plannin!! Case 06-15: Zonin!! Ordinance Addition for the B-4 Zone <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated applicant is requesting a Zoning Ordinance addition to allow "highcr <br />education" and "special education" as a permilted use in the B-4 Zone, The B-4 Zone <br />encompasscs those properties immediately adjacent to Dunlap Street North between Red Fox <br />Road and Grey Fox Road. <br /> <br />He indicated although Planning Case 06-016 (Special Use Permit for Higher and Special <br />Education) was dependent upon this planning case, the details of Plamling Case 06-015 should <br />not be considered when evaluating the request in this planning case. When reviewing a zoning <br />ordinance amendment or addition, it was important to consider how thc changc would affect thc <br />entire zone instead of one spccific property, If approved as requested, higher or special education <br />could be a permitted use on any property in the B-4 Zone, <br /> <br />He stated the Planning Commission recommendcd approval (4-2) of the Zoning Ordinance <br />request to allow higher and special education as a special use in the B-4 Zone, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.