My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-12-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-12-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - May 22, 2006 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Ifthe parking lot is unable to accommodate the parking needs of the building, the <br />applicant shall increase the number of parking stalls to meet the City's parking <br />requirement through the site plan review process. <br />If the educational use exceeds 80 students, the applicant shall provide proof of <br />parking for the additional students at a rate of one parking space per student. Thc <br />proof of parking shall include a signed agreement between the property owner and <br />the parking provider, the length of the agreement, and the number of parking <br />spaces provided. The proof of parking and parking agreement and student <br />expansion shall be subject to the approval by the City Planner. <br /> <br />5, <br /> <br />He indicated staff has not received any public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Holden asked where they would be able to acquire additional parking spaces, <br />Mr. Lehnhoff responded they could expand some on their property, but the City also allowed <br />shared parking with surrounding properties. He indicated they would need to get a proof of <br />parking for shared parking with othcr properties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked why they were being asked to give a special usc pennit for both <br />spccial education and higher education. He believed they addressed different things, Mr. <br />Lehnhoff stated this would provide additional flexibility, <br /> <br />Rob Davidson, 3900 Northwoods Drive #125, stated he was the owner of the 1212 building. <br />He stated they wanted both uses to meel needs of flexibility for market share, He noted this <br />would be a significant investment in improvements so if there was a change in the character of <br />the education, they wanted the flexibility to usc either special or higher education, He did not <br />believe parking would be an issue because lhe school would be in operation aftcr normal <br />business hours, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated Mr. Davidson was also responsible for the renovation of Anchor <br />Bank, which was a nice upgrade to that building and he believed this building would be of the <br />same caliber. Mr. Davidson staled the 1212 building was a 1970's building that necded a lot of <br />renovation. He noted they would renovate the east and north face of the building, which was the <br />only public use of the building. <br /> <br />MOTION: Counci1member Larson moved and Councilmember Pellegrin seconded a <br />motion to approve the Special Use Permit for higher and special education <br />subject to the five recommended conditions as noted in staffs May 15, <br />2006 report. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla noted the approval of the Special Use Pennit has to be effective following the datc of <br />publication of the text amendment Ordinance. <br /> <br />The motion carned unanimously (5-0), <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.