My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 12,2006 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary building pem1its before beginning any <br />modifications to the exterior of the structure. <br />3, Signage shall comply with the Sign Code, Signage shall not be installed without any <br />approved sign permit <br />4. Lighting shall conform to the requirements in Section 6.E.3 of the Zoning Ordinances. <br />Lighting shall be directed away from adjacent properties, hooded, and not cast light <br />that exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public <br />streets or .4 foot candles on adjoining residential property. <br /> <br />He recommended Council approve the Site Plan Review for 12] 2 LLC at ] 212 Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />Councihnember Grant inquired about the materials used, Mr. Davidson, the applicant, <br />responded the main surfacing would be a cement finish applied directly to the block. With <br />respect to the base, they were still working on that particular application. However the base <br />would be a rock faced block, artificial stone material or other similar material. He indicated it <br />would be a material that would be damage resistant <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson inquired about the difference in the two entrances. Mr. Davidson <br />stated the entrance in the middle was generated by the tenant in hopes of creating a statement for <br />their entrance. He noted they were continuing to define the northerly entrance and he believed <br />the north entrance would also be prominent <br /> <br />Couucilmember Holden asked ifthere would be new lighting added. Mr. Davidson responded <br />currently the lighting on the east edge of the building would be removed and new pole lighting <br />on the far eastern end of the parking lot would be added. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Couneilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case 06-0]8: Site Plan Review 12]2 LLC at <br />1212 Red Fox Road based on the submitted plans and nine findings of fact <br />subject to the four conditions in the planning case report. The motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski recessed the meeting at 8:16 p.m, and reconvened the meeting at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br />8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Motion to Reieet/Aceept Bids for the 2006 Ridl!ewood PMP Construction Proiect <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom stated at the May 18 Counei] meeting, the Council considered the bids received on <br />May] 1,2006 for the 2006 PMP Ridgewood Neighborhood Improvements. Amt Construction <br />submitted the low bid with a total bid amount of$I,808,584.32. <br /> <br />At that meeting, Council tabled the award of this bid in order to provide staff time to find ways to <br />reduce the overall cost of this project so that they would be more in line with the available funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.