My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-26-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 06-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 12, 2006 8 <br /> <br />She indicated the low bid was approximately $289,625.90 higher than the Engineer's Estimate . <br />and $437,894.32 higher than the Feasibility Estimate. She stated they had found a number of <br />areas where they could reduce the scope without compromising the integrity of the project. In <br />addition to these reductions, they identified a few other line items that have the potential for <br />reductions, however, she recommended they manage these quantities through construction <br />observation, She reviewed the proposed reductions in the contract quantities. <br /> <br />She recommended Council award the bid to Amt Construction. To reduce the award bid, the <br />Council would then approve Change Order #1, containing the items noted in her report to reduce <br />the total bid by $118,690, 16. The Change Order would alter the total bid award to <br />$1,689,894.16. <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe reviewed the CIP cost impacts. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant inquired about the offsets for capital improvements and asked ifthey <br />needed to make a decision on that at this meeting. He asked i fthe alternatives were small or large <br />items. Ms. Bloom responded staff would pay particular attention to the cost of retaining walls <br />and trees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson believed they needed to do this street reconstruction and they had other <br />sources for funding, such as the General Capital Fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if someone backed out of having a rain garden, how that would . <br />affect the project. Ms. Bloom responded this would not require a re-engineering and would <br />actually reduce the cost because there would be no excavation necessary for the pond. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the project time line was. Ms. Bloom replied she believed <br />everything would get done this year, with the exception of the landscaping which would be done <br />in spring of2007. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if this neighborhood was being shortchanged by not doing the <br />watermain changes. Ms. Bloom responded the scope changes would not compromise the project <br />and ifwatermain needed to be replaced, it would be replaced. <br /> <br />MOTION; Councilmcmber Larson moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion <br />to award the 2006 PMP Ridgewood Neighborhood Improvement Project <br />to Amt Construction and approve Change Order #1, The motion carried <br />unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />MOTION; Councilmember Holden moved and Councihnember Grant seconded a <br />motion to approve Change Order #1 for the 2006 PMP Ridgewood <br />Neighborhood Project. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.