My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-21-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 08-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:21:41 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 10:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />May 12, 2004 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2.E <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and Council <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator Gn-~ <br /> <br />Thomas J. Moore; Director of Operations & Maintenance ~ ~ <' ~ <br /> <br />County Road E Pedestrian Improvement Update i <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Staff has held two neighborhood meetings to discuss the possibility of improving pedestrian <br />movcment on the south side of County Road E, from Lindey's Park to Connelly Avenue_ These <br />proposed improvements include a sidewalk system leading up to and over the County Road E <br />Bridge over TH 51. <br /> <br />NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING & PUBLIC .FEEDBACK <br />A total of 250 households received meeting notices for each meeting. Of those notified, a total <br />of 29 residents attended the two meetings, 20 for the first and nine for the second. In addition, a <br />total of three Councilmembers and five PTRC members attended at least one of the meetings. <br /> <br />There are seven homes located on the south side of County Road E. Four of those homeowners <br />attended at least one of the meetings; the other three neither attended nor contacted staff to <br />express their opinions. Of the four household represented, three expressed opposition to thc <br />sidewalk in front of their homes and one expressed support for the project Reasons for <br />opposition were: safety issues with entering/exiting their driveways, loss of landscape, more <br />pedestrians using the sidewalk and high traffic volume on County Road E_ There is a high level <br />of angcr at the City in this neighborhood. This is due to a past Council decision many years ago <br />to close off a road bypass that substantially increased traffic on County Road E and thus changed <br />the quality of life of the neighborhood in a negative way. Except for the four mentioned above, <br />all residents who attended both meetings expressed support for a sidewalk to be installed on the <br />County Road E Bridge over TH 51. Staff has also received 25 emails/phone calls from residents <br />on these proposed improvements. All of thcse 25 contacts were in support uf the sidewalk <br />component as well as sidewalk on the bridge. <br /> <br />REOUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />Provide future work direction for City staff. <br /> <br />\\Earth'J>R&Pw\Operations & Maintemmcc\County Road E Trail\Memo to CowlCil5-] 2-04.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.