CC 02-08-1960 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� 23 � a NR. PC?POVICH: It's impossible to give you the detail. Let me say this� you must be careful in comparing apples with apples and not a gsapefruit with a prune. It depends on how a community may do its financing. In Falcon Heights they had a combination of taxes and front foot assessment: I've forgotten what that was - about $9.00 a front foot - but they had a very healthy tax increase of about 15 mills that went along with it. Here, you the improvements were large. In Shoreview� which incidentally have a p�re $10.Q0 front foot without any tax increase. If you want to compare this proposal with Falcon Heights, ycu see, you're trying to compare purely a 100pS assessment with a bombination $4.�0 and the mill rate. I am convinced in Falcon Heights thatwhen you tak e the mill rate increase into consfderation it's more than the'$lO.CQ you have here. In Rose�ille their first one ren $6.05 a front foot. 'Ih@ secand assessment ran $6.25. The third, that's now under way, is estimated around $7.00 with a millage fncrease also there that 1 think on the first ons was 1-mill, on the second itTs 3 and I think about 6 on the third one. Of course, thisrdllage is something that depends on what your assessed valuation might be. Tn Roseville will be holding a heazing on their sanitary sewer improvement program on March 29, it is estimated there that will run $10.50 a front foot. This is varied fxom a high, for example, of New Hope where they put in sewer that ran as high as $13.00 a front foot all the way down to $6.00 or $6.5C a front foot. It varies - one reason is the construction situation you run into - the combinatian of financiny that you do - but this is in line with ather munici{�lities that are 100°b special assessment as this is. t�i. GERALD 9UET0,4, 1443 Forest Lane: Roger, can you give me a