My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-08-1960
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1960
>
CC 02-08-1960
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:19:10 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 9:03:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />m <br />� <br />sewer contzactor that would do the sewer co�struction probably <br />will sublet the strest cons;ruction to somebody else and there is <br />an additional handling charge on it so there are certain things <br />that it is felt that it's cheaper ta do it as two separate items <br />at t�Ho separate times and in this case with some of your streets <br />being just an oiled surface there would be substantial to gain <br />by waiting. <br />Nf�. SHOftT: Another fact to compare Falcon Heights and Arden <br />� <br />Hills. Arden Hills is more clay than sand. Sand will remain <br />relatively stable after the wozk is completed whereas you can <br />pack clay until the cows come hortw and still following a frost <br />it will tend to soften up so as Mr. Popovich said it's hard to <br />compare one with another on all conditions becaus� condit-ions are <br />just different as to soil and other things. <br />NRS. BILL NdLF. 317Q No. Hamline: I was wond�ring what the <br />comparison was of our improvements on Number 1 and 2 as compared <br />with this estimate on 3. �ihat the footage costs are. <br />N,P,YOR ASHB�4CH: <br />$12.5C a front foot <br />been werked out yet. <br />I know the estimate for Improvement No. 1 was <br />It came out cheaper than that. That has not <br />hP. POPOVICH: In (Vumber 1 it was $12.60 a front foot and Nc. 2 <br />� <br />it was $1C.50 a front foot sc we're a little less here. The reason <br />for it in Improvement No. 1, it was such a small project and yet <br />you had certain costs involved irrespective of the number of homes. <br />tiR. SHORT: <br />A�tS . 'NOLF : <br />I think the principal reason for the difference - <br />I meant between $12Q,00� and $6GO,G00. <br />1�R. SHORT: Because of the size of the improvement. <br />MAYOR ASHBACH: Any other questions? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.