Laserfiche WebLink
� . . <br />Minut�� of Special CvuncSl Heeei6� December 13, 1979 <br />Peg� Thzee <br />Ericksou - W� do have a court ordes you will tecall of July of <br />1979. T6at cousi order, witl� the aew ordinance, has a juxtapOs- <br />iticn that leavee ua myssified as to the end'tesult9 aud I would, <br />th�refoae, psesume the Couneil would not inCend to apply thie or- <br />d3n�nce to North�+estern Callege, wfth ¢:haY court ardar in miad. ' <br />Woadbnrn said i[ seem� to be much �oge of a"legal question" than <br />a�galicy queetioa'°; we are pursuing policy, at this point; the <br />legai aepact would have to depemmd on advice ftom others (as far <br />aa Woodburn is coace.rned), <br />Bricicson - The court ordes is diz�cted to the C3ty. It does sap <br />that�u shanld iesue a permit" aad (Brickaon read speeific lang- <br />• aa�e from tke court order) I preenme you iatend to abide 6q that <br />courC order. <br />Boadbura - T am not able by mpae2f to �ntespree thaL coust order, <br />ii�tre is a choice these. - <br />Crep�go - On adaise of Coun6B1... <br />Eri.ck�oa - Z presnme you latend ta abide by it. H1�st you're saying <br />ie yon 8on't iaterpret it. but aince ie is in eaistence I pzesume <br />you are saying yon v�41 ebide by it as interpYeted. <br />Woodbarn - Does ihat aaswer qaur questionsY <br />Bsickson - No, it does not. I aeuld like a atatement off eoncensue <br />£rom ehis C�uncil ae to Che fmpect of Lhst cuurt deeieion upoa thls <br />ordinance...e atatement to the effect ehat you intend to abide by <br />that court order. it ie importaat for us. _ <br />CrepAau - It dependa oa erho interprets the couxt o$der and how the <br />interpretation is made, I eupposea <br />Exic�eon - I�rould presu�e Yf these ia a questioa of iaterpretation, <br />you ao�ald be righe, pour honor. I em presuming then, that it would <br />be aflideai bg rsnd pou �aould £ollow it? <br />Csepaaa - I am certaia of thst9 but we°d �eve ta go oa advice of <br />oar �oundtl. <br />Erickaon - Ta ehat t�e concunsna? <br />HaBaoa - aaggeated Chat 1� t&ere are queaEioAa of leg�l counotarion <br />that ve volan¢eer ;reeponse to them at �he next eeeting. <br />ErLcBceoa - cert�ialy. <br />Co�CAnu3ng--�F pr�eua� &hat [he City �ould no2 iptead to apply ihie <br />ordinaace es pro�oeod £os otder zea�oas; refsrsad to hYstarq girea <br />bp ma�or re proeeesiag of thie ordinance aud to ttae for�er public <br />hear:ing et which ti�e �lorthweaterxe CalAege waald have been a'Special <br />parm:itted use at its preeent site. Ydnied thst that ordinance was <br />presented in confor�ance wfth Gosnprelaena3ve Plan of 19J6 aad re- <br />ma3nr.:d ia thae ¢o�m eeen thoug2e proposed amend�eats weY� rejeeted. <br />. Eriek3on notext C1iat by the gropa�ed oselinance, Norehwestern Gollege <br />is made a non-conkorming use, and is not sure �faether Council undea- <br />etancPs the im�sace of eteat chaa��e, We inyaired of the atatus of chia <br />ordi�3anc� and rsere advis�d by ihe Glerh Administratqr that the <br />ordiE��nce chan�es wese "mixioe�" a�d "few"; was edvised by Mr. Lpadea <br />that he vas not acrar� of charage made in the status of Northweatern <br />CoSlege . <br />Erickaon said, 4n revi�v.af Planning Commisaion minut�s, CrlchLon <br />edvi�ad Lhat the ordinaace vae zevi�ed elight2y. P2anaer, toaight <br />eaid Lhe chsngea xere "noe a�ajor" and that the echool definitlon <br />chaage wns ocaly eo agp3q a"bft anore conexol" af significant in- <br />atic�tions. I aannatm trierefore. believe you undesetand the impact <br />3 <br />