Laserfiche WebLink
idinutes of Regular Council Meefinn <br />i'age four <br />C� <br />October 16, 1978 <br />snpprow : �re: <br />a. LotS B, 2 and 3 of EiBock I have a depth of 128.! feeY(130 <br />feet FS; require6). <br />b. Lots 6 and 7 have lot widths at setbacic tine of approxFinately <br />90 feet (95 teet is required). <br />Mofifon carried unanimous�y. <br />It was Counci6's understandinq that a 10� cash park dedication be <br />riegotiated fin iieu of Eand); execution of the plat to be de- <br />�.Ferred until bids are a�+arded and park dedicatfon aoreement ts <br />resolved. <br />78-26. Amended Soeciaq Use Permit - Additi <br />Councii aas reie.rred to Planner Report of 9-27-78 and to Planninq <br />Commissior recommendations (minutes ot 10-4-78); noted that <br />screening of extsrior storaae was a concern of the Planning Com- <br />n,ission.and of adjacent property owner5. <br />Nfter dlscussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Crichton, ?hat <br />(:ouncll approve issuance of an Amended Special Use Permit tor Addi- <br />1-ions and ABterations to ?he Arden,Hilis Public Works Building and <br />fippurtenances, as per plan dated 8-29-78; amended landscape.plan, <br />providing additlonal landscaptng to effectively scree� the extertor <br />storage �rom the south and east, to be submitted for approvat by. <br />ihe CTty Planner. Motion carried unanimously. <br />R.rchitect was authorized to prepere construction plans and adver- <br />tisament �or bids; Counci( to conslder bids at November 13 Councit <br />n�eeting if pbssibfe. <br />t for Offi <br />Cou��cil wss referred to Planner Rsport of 6-3l-78, E3oard ot Appea�s <br />F.eport of 9-6-7$, SofY Foundation 9nvestigation Report (7-30-74), <br />Planning Commission recommendations (Minutes of l0-4-78) and to <br />revised pian prepared in acco�dance with Planning Commission's <br />recommendations of 10-4-78. <br />Nil9er noted thafi ihe <br />rear setback varlance <br />8nvestigai�(on report. <br />Board ot Appeals recommsndation to deny the <br />was mads prfor to receipt of the Soil <br />Wingert moved, secondad by Hanson, that Council approve the 15 fooi' <br />rear setback variae�ce, because a substantial portion of the varlence <br />requested is due to uastabBe soi! conditions and lot dimension, <br />and ttiat Council approve issuance of a Bullding Permit for an <br />office buifding as per revised plan rec�ived 10-16-78 pendtno <br />satEsfaction of the park dedicafion. <br />Af��ar discussion, Wingert moved thafi the mo?1on be amended to add <br />the foYloring conditions: <br />� I. An amended landscape plan be submifted, appraved by-the <br />City Pianner, which provides additionaf landscapfng alonq the <br />west- side of -hhe site (raest of the driveway> using similar <br />plant varieties and sizes. <br />2. ApproprEate,. Landscape Performance <br />approvad Landscape Plan. <br />'3 Grading ptan be approved by City <br />Bond bs submitted as per <br />Engineer. <br />M��tfon.as amended carried (Wingert, Hanson, Crepeau votinq in,favor <br />oP the motion; Crichton and Woodburn votino io opposition3. <br />C;ese No. 78-29, Buiidinq Permit for Office/Warehouse Distribution <br />C�nter - Scholis, Inc. � <br />Mfller referred Council 4o sevaral subdivision options of the area <br />w�st of Round Lake; no#ed tha�P the 8 acre #:w: proposed Scholl°s <br />de3vefopmenS invoives the eonsideratfon of two existtng parcels; <br />proposed development conforms to the overalt subdivision scheme .and <br />is not considered defirimenta! to fufiure development of the area. <br />Counci I arz�s ref�rred to Pl�nner Report (9-29-78), Engineer <br />