CC 10-16-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mi�nutes of R�gular Council �eeting Qctober l6, 1978 Fage five Chr(sfioffersen'S letter of 9-29-78, Herry Schroeder9s letter of 9••25-78, and to the proposed plans for development of the s(te. Sc:hroeder described fhe building to be of pre-stressed concrets� us�ing tan and bro�n tones with bronze trim; descrlbed dralnaqe as currentPy to the take; propose: a Getention pond af#er whiCh run-off Mater NiV1 perco9ate through Y�e ground and then to the 9z�ke after a1! pollulantS have baen removed; reported that they �a:ve drainage approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Sch roede� described the Scholl's daily distribution pperatlon to be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. dn revie� ofi the bufiding elevatioas, tt was noted that the fdoor elevation is at 906`; roof at 926'; tree line at 895'. • Schroeder said he fs sure some of the existing trees are over 30' in heighi. Miller said the Duilding will be "pretty much" hiddsn trom v(ew from across the lake. Schroeder said they have atte�pted to keep the scale dorn - no roof top equipment is pro- posed on ths warehouse roof and two roof top units probably on the low office roof. � MiiBer noted that the proposed landscaptng does not canstitute a ffnal Landscape Plan; will �ant some softening of the larga. truck area as vier�d from the north. Schroeder noted that the trash enclosure �ill be architecturaliy screened and iandscaped. Woodburn movsd, seconded by�Wingert, that CouncTl approve issuance ot a Bu(Iding Permit for the Scho-11's Distrlbution Center as per ptan dated (received 9-20-78); sewer and drainaqe pfans are to be submitted for approval by the City Engineer; landscape plan to be sui�mttted to City Planner for approval and determination of ap- propriate landscape performance bond; park dedication to be satisfied prior fio occupancy ot the building. Motion carried unanimously. � (D��vetoper to contact Councilman Crichfon relative to park dedica- ti��n �egotf�tions). , dlna Permit for Buiidina Addittons - Mtlier refes�red Councit to his report of 10-2-78 and to Stewart Lumbers' si�e plan indicatfng iocatlo�s of three proposed lean-to additions to existiny..��iGNtl�nr�gs. Mi�ler expiained tfiat the Steaart lumber development existed prfor to the incorporation of the Clty; use is permitted by Ordinance, bui• certain aspects of the deveiopment do not conform to Ordinance requirements; should recognize.the situa�Fion and, et some time, site sh<�uEd be controlled by a Special Uss Permit to attempt fio resolve the� non-contormities; difficult to requlre a Specfai Use Pe rmit for covered exteriar storaga proposed - more appropriate to alert app�ltcanf #o the Speciaf Use Permlt approach to move the p�operty to conformlty at some future data. Milier nated that the propos�d @ean-to structures do not tncrease • the non-con�ormity; buildinas meet setback and height require- ments; purpose is to cover exlsting outside storAge; buildings are no t e 6! o t��ta� it cove age tmaJority of site is coy�re ,• e s�c n be�o ru �to meet setback requirements. Mllfer said storage couid Ce restrtcted from the setbaek areas to minimiae the impacf; better to screen and aMlow the storage but cost e�ould Axceed the proposed buSiding coverage. Atter dfscussion, Crichton mov�A, seconded by iiingert, that Counctl approve issuance of a Buiiding P�rmft for the shed - roof stcuctures as per pian dated (receivsd 9-26n78), with the continqency that the si-ructur� no� encroach into the required s�tbaek areas. Motion carriod unanie�ausly. Council not�d fhat scr�ening work ahich can be. stsrted would be to e5_